I do not own the broadcast rights, but I am posting it here under fair use for public discussion and informing and hope Tucker Carlson will be okay with that. I will update as I complete more.
Bret Weinstein: The fact that this small group of dissidents was able to upend the narrative, was able to bring to people’s awareness the massive levels of harm and the ineffectiveness of the shots, is in some ways, the most surprising element of this story. And I think it truly surprised pharma and its partners in social media, in government, in non governmental organizations. I think that they thought that they owned enough of the media that they could sell us any narrative that they wished. I think surprising as it is, they didn’t really understand that podcasts could possibly be a countervailing force of significance.
Tucker Carlson: If you own NBC news, it’s enough.
Bret Weinstein: You would think, right, you know, it’s failing to update from the buying by the barrel aphorism.
Um, so what happened was, it turned out that a number of us were willing to make mistakes and correct them in real time, to talk about this in plain English with the public, to do so in Joe Rogan’s you know man cave. And the fact is people listened. Because of course this was on everybody’s mind, and what they were supposed to do to protect – you know, they’d been terrified, what to do to protect your family’s health was a question that everyone wanted to know the answer to. So, our ability to reach millions of people, surprised those who thought they were just going to shove this narrative down our throats.
And this gets me to the WHO, World Health Organization and its pandemic preparedness plan modifications. What I believe is going on is the World Health Organization is now revising the structures that allowed the dissidents to upend the narrative, and they are looking for a rematch, I think. What they want are the measures that would have allowed them to silence the podcasters, to mandate various things internationally in a way that would prevent the emergence of a control group that would allow us to see harms clearly…So that’s the reason that I think people, as much as they want to move on from thinking about covid —maybe stop thinking about covid.
But do start thinking about what has taken (is taking?) place with respect to medicine, with respect to public health, with respect to pharma, and ask yourself the question, given what you now know, would you want to relive a pandemic like the covid pandemic, without the tools that allowed you to ultimately in the end see clearly that it didn’t make sense to take another one of these shots, or to have your kids take one. Right, we want those tools, in fact, we need them and something is quietly moving just out of sight, in order that we will not have access to them the next time we face an emergency
Tucker Carlson: so you’re saying that an international health organization could just (inaudible)
Bret Weinstein: Yes, and in fact much as this sounds, I know that it sounds preposterous
Tucker Carlson: it does not sound preposterous.
Bret Weinstein: The ability to do it is currently under discussion at the international level. And it’s almost impossible to exaggerate how troubling what is being discussed is. In fact, I think it is fair to say, that we are in the middle of a coup. We are actually facing the elimination of our national and our personal sovereignty and that is the purpose of what is being constructed.
It has been written in such a way that your eyes are supposed glaze over (32:12) as you attempt to sort out what is under discussion. And if you do that, come May of this year, your nation is almost certain to sign on to an agreement that in some utterly vaguely described future circumstance, a public health emergency, which the director general of the World Health organization has total liberty to define in any way that he sees fit. In other words, nothing prevents um, climate change from being declared a public health emergency that would trigger the provisions of these modifications. And in the case that some emergency or some, pretense of an emergency shows up, the provisions that would kick in are beyond jaw dropping.
Tucker Carlson: So, before you get into it, and I want to thank you, by the way, for taking it on to go through this proposal because you’re absolutely right, it’s impenetrable, it’s designed that way, to cloak what they’re saying around the (inaudible), um, what’s it called?
Bret Weinstein: Well, the funny thing is actually, I was looking this morning to find out what the current name is and the names have actually been shifted slightly. Clearly a feature –
Tucker Carlson: Oh, it’s a shape shifting agreement, perfect (laughing)
What has been proposed are, and again, the number of things included here is incredible. It’s hard for, even for those of us who have been focussed on this to track all of the important things under discussion, and to deduce the meaning of some of the more subtle provisions. But they – the World Health Organization and its signatory nations will be allowed to define a public health emergency on any basis, that having declared one, they will be entitled to mandate remedies. The remedies that are named include vaccines, gene therapy technology is literally named in the set of things that World Health Organization is going to reserve the right to mandate, that it will be in a position to require these things of citizens, that it will be in a position to dictate our ability to travel in other words passports that would be predicated on one having accepted these technologies are clearly being described. It would have the ability to forbid the use of other medications, so this looks like they’re preparing for a rerun where they can just simply take ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine off the table. They also have reserved the ability to dictate how these measures are discussed, censorship is described here as well, the right to dictate that well, of course misinformation is how they’re going to describe it.
Tucker Carlson: Well, in fact, I want to ask you to pause while I play a clip, a soundbite from Tedros, in which he alludes to this stuff and I want to get your thoughts on it.
(clip of Tedros of the WHO 36:36)
Tedros: We continue to see misinformation on social media and in mainstream media about the pandemic accord that countries are now negotiating. The claim that the accord will cede authority to the WHO is quite simply false. It’s fake news. Countries will decide what the accord says and countries alone. And countries will implement the accord in line with their own national laws. No country will cede any sovereignty to WHO. Any politician any business person, or anyone at all is confused about what the pandemic accord is or is not, we would be more than happy to discuss it and explain it.
Tucker Carlson: They’re spooked enough about it to lie.
Bret Weinstein: Yes, you couldn’t have said it better. Those were clearly lies, and his saying them into a camera is supposed to convince you now nobody could possibly lie so directly so there must be some truth in what he’s saying. (37.57) which is of course nonsense. Anybody who goes back through Matt rofolo’s? compendium of various things that people have said into cameras over the course of
covid that they then swear they didn’t say months later, knows that these folks are very comfortable at saying totally false things into a camera. It doesn’t cause them to think twice or sweat or anything.
But it’s great that we have managed to raise enough awareness that Tedros is actually addressing our spreading of – what it actually is is malinformation. You’re aware of this extension? It’s beautiful.
Tucker Carlson: No, I was , I’m so old that I was still stuck in the truth or falsehood binary where what mattered was whether it was true or not. (laughing)
Bret Weinstein: No, malinformation is actually exactly what you need to know about to see how antiquated that notion is. And this is because, this is actually the department of homeland security issued a memo in which it defined three kinds of – I kid you not – terrorism: mis, dis and mal information. Misinformation are errors, disinformation are intentional errors, lies, and malinformation are things that are based in truth but cause you to distrust authority. (laughter)
Tucker Carlson: So malinformation is what you commit when you catch them lying.
Bret Weinstein: exactly, it is discussing the lies of your government is malinformation and therefore a kind of terrorism which I should point out as funny as that is and as obviously Orwellian as that is, it’s also terrifying because if you have tracked the history of the spreading tyranny from the beginning of the war on terror, you know that terrorism is not a normal English word the way it once was. Terrorism is now a legal designation that causes all your rights to evaporate, so if the point of the department of homeland security says that you are guilty of a kind of terrorism for saying true things that cause you to distrust your government, they are also telling you something about what rights they have to silence you. They are not normal rights. So, these things are all terrifying and I do think as much as—
Tucker Carlson: my jaw’s open.
Bret Weinstein: The covid pandemic caused us to become aware of a lot of structures that had been built around us, something that former NSA officer William Binney once described as the turnkey totalitarian state. The totalitarian state is erected around you, but it’s not activated, and then, once it’s built, the key gets turned.
So we are now seeing what I believe even outstrips William Binney’s description because it’s the turnkey totalitarian planet, okay. World Health organization is above the level of nations and it is going to be in a position, if these provisions pass, to dictate to nations how they are to treat their own citizens, to override their constitutions, despite what Tedros told you. So that is frightening. It’s not inherently about health. What I think has happened is the fact of a possible pandemic causes a loophole in the mind. It’s not a loophole in our governance documents. Our Constitution doesn’t describe exemptions from your rights during a time of pandemic emergency – your rights simply are what they are and they’re not supposed to go anywhere just because there’s a disease spreading.
But nonetheless, people’s willingness to accept the erosion of their rights because of a public health emergency has allowed this tyranny to use it as a Trojan horse. And I think that’s also, it’s something people need to become aware of. That there are a number of features of our environment that are, basically they are blind spots that we can’t see past. The vaccine was one, and I know, I was an enthusiast about the vaccine, I still believe deeply in the elegance of vaccines as they should exist, but I’m now very alarmed about how they are produced, and I’m even more alarmed at what has been called a vaccine but doesn’t meet the definition. Right?
Because many of us believe that vaccines were an extremely elegant low harm high efficacy method of preventing disease, when they called this mrna technology a vaccine, many of us gave it more credibility than we should have. If they had called it a gene transfection technology, we would have thought, wait, what? That sounds highly novel and it sounds dangerous and how much do we know about the long term implications? But because they called it a vaccine people were much readily, were much more willing to accept it.
Public health functions the same way, if you think about it, public health—let’s step back a sec. Your relationship with your doctor, your personal health, ought to be very important to you. But there are ways in which things that happen at a population level affect your personal health and your doctor’s not in a position to do anything about it. Somebody dropping pollution into a stream from which you’re pulling fish, you know, you might detect the harm at a population level , make a regulation at the population level to protect you, your doctor’s not in a position to correct it.
So the idea that the public health is potentially a place to improve all of our well being is real, but once you decide there’s something above doctors relative to your health, that can be an excuse for all manner of tyranny. Public health has been adopted – it’s like the sheep’s clothing that has allowed the wolf to go after our rights because in theory it’s trying to protect us from harms that we would like to be protected from. (44:12)
Tucker Carlson: And it generates such fear at such a huge scale that it weakens people’s moral immune systems, accepting things they would never accept.
Bret Weinstein: Absolutely, and as you know, and as I know, when we raised questions about what was being delivered to us under the guise of public health, we were demonized as if we had a moral defect, it wasn’t even a cognitive defect, where we were failing to understand the wisdom of these vaccines, it was a moral defect. We were failing to protect others who were vulnerable by questioning these things, and so, the idea that health is at stake in some vague, larger sense that requires us to override the natural relationship between doctors and patients is, itself, a coup against medicine by something else. And we need to become aware of that.
Tucker Carlson: Just to check,on the kind of souls of the people who are running all of this, the public health establishment the international public health establishment, now that some researchers believe up to 17 million people could have been killed by these mrna shots, has any international ppublic official said, hold on, we need to get to the bottom of that? Has that provoked any response from the people in charge of our public health??
Bret Weinstein: I’m trying to think globally whether there are good examples. There’s certainly people who have stood up in the European parliament.
Tucker Carlson: But I mean in the world’s public health organizations, the CDC…
Bret Weinstein: No, I don’t, we have not seen an acknowledgment of the harm and error.
Tucker Carlson: They don’t know? They don’t have access to the internet? I mean, what is that?
Bret Weinstein: Well, that’s the incredible thing…the claims, that just simply, if they initially had believed them, then they are long ago falsified, but they are still being advanced for whoever hasn’t noticed. You know, the idea that it’s a good idea to vaccinate your kids with mrna shots being one of them. Right? To the extent that there was a panic that caused us to give these shots to people that couldn’t possibly benefit from them. You would have expected us to back that off really rapidly as it became impossible to defend those shots. And yet there’s still presumably some market for it. We’re still doing it.
So we are still living some crazy story where things that are perfectly obvious somehow still have not lodged themselves in the public record, and I think that has to do with the death of journalism. A lot of us are doing jobs we didn’t train for, Heather and I are doing some journalistic job we certainly didn’t train for. We trained to think about biology, and we do that in front of the camera so that functions as a kind of stand-in for journalism but the handful of journalists that still exist, I think without exception, are not scientifically trained. You know, Matt taibe, Glenn Greenwald, you…We don’t have very many people doing investigative journalism and the ones who are doing it, they don’t have the skill set that would make this a natural topic to investigate. We have to boot up some kind of new institution that will allow us to do this job well, and presumably that will involve taking the few journalists who remember how to do that job and the few scientists and doctors who are willing to still do their job and put us together – right, a podcast isn’t the right place to do it – if that’s all we got, that’s all we got, but there’s got to be a better method.
Tucker Carlson: So if this is ratified, signed on to by the United States in May, less than six months from now, it sounds like that’s it.
Bret Weinstein: We don’t know. I will say I have very little hope that the U.S. Will derail this. I have the sense that whatever has captured our government is driving this as well, so in effect, the U.S. wants this change to go into effect. You know, in the same way that the five eyes nations agree to mutually violate the rights of each other’s citizens. That was not prevented by any of our constitutions. I think the U.S. wants something to force us to violate our Constitutional protections and the World Health Organization is going to be that entity.
That said, I have recently been to the Czech republic and I have been to Romania, and I have heard from other parts of the former eastern bloc, there is resistance – people who faced tyranny in living memory are much less ready to accept these changes and that they are actually beginning to mount a response. I worry that it would be too thin and easily defeated, especially if they do not understand that actually the world is depending on them, countries we traditionally think of as part of the west are compromised. And countries which have recently joined the west are the best hope we’ve got. They are in a position to derail this set of provisions and we are depending on them to do it.
Tucker Carlson: I just want to end for a few moments on an overview. So you have all these remarkable things converging at the same time: war, pestilence, political unrest, apparently unsolvable political unrest… What do you think we’re looking at, in the West? What is this moment? How does it end?
Bret Weinstein: Well, so I have long been interested in questions of good governance and the West. I’m sad to report that I think the West has actually collapsed and what we are left with is now a nebulous echo.(50:50)
So James O’Keefe, who was pushed out of the board of the company he started, Project Veritas, last month, bounced back quickly with his own “OMG” news network. And the story he started with is a multiple-illegalities suggesting scheme revealed within the record of individual donations to ActBlue. What scheme? Well, what kicked off the story was what a voter integrity grassroots group found by simply doing searches using the publicly available Federal Elections Commissiion’s website “individual donation” data. This group then passed what they found onto James O’Keefe who has the means to publicize it. A great thing is that you can replicate their process yourself, since the data is available to anyone with a pc.
When searching by “ActBlue” as the recipient, you receive results that show an alphabetized list of the individuals who donated to ActBlue on a given day. I expect what caught the group’s attention was what caught my attention immediately, namely that there are repeated donations by the same individual ON THE SAME DAY. Then, to expand the dates covered but narrow by the individual giving the donations, you can type in the name of an individual you see has donated more than five times on the one day, for example.
So, let’s start with the first one showing more than five donations on one single day 12/31/22. Zoski, Glenn. (Because political donations are not write offs for taxes, there is no reason to give a bunch on the last day of the year)
Narrowed by his name, keeping actblue as the recipient, and we find there were 9286 donations made by him to actblue. I exported the data, and sorted by date. All of the donations were in 2022.
Just so I don’t forget, here are the issues that raises:
violating contribution limits
giving in the name of someone else
could be hiding foreign donations
or american donations from a rich person
and someone on redpill news said that it would be great if the court ordered the money donated in the person’s name without their knowledge (ie hiding the true source of the donation) be returned to the person in whose name it was donated, even though it actually came from someone else
also, why didn’t the fec database flag this immediately?
crazyness
. Let’s look more deeply into Zoski, just one donor.
Another thing is, many of the people giving these thousands of times in one year were unemployed or retired. So they didn’t have the money to donate like this. Zoski, sorted by date and actblue as recipient, 2438 donations. 13394.54 in total in 2022, just to ActBlue. 5008.38 in just January of 2022, just to ActBlue. But ActBlue reports repeatedly, even as thousands of donations are reported in this person’s name, incorrect or false numbers in the “aggregate amount” column. In January they say the aggregate amount is 500.43, even though as discussed, the total donated by him to actblue in January is 5008.38. “Aggregate amount” given is 1036.21 for all of February 2022, though 5038.62 is the actual amount donated in Feb 2022. In March, the “aggregate amount” listed all month long is 1306.90 but 2479.64 is the total actually donated in March 2022. Keep in mind that what “aggregate amount” is actually supposed to include is not just the current month, but the combined amounts given up to that point in time. Between april and november 2022 there are only 15 donations totalling 214 dollars donated in his name to Actblue the total is raised to 1315.90. Then in December 2022 there are 105 donations totalling 653.90 made in his name. 1379.80 is the final “aggregate amount” listed in December 2022. 13394.54 is the actual “aggregate amount” of donations made by him to actblue in 2022.
just one page of the chart I made which compared the “aggregate amount” reported to the FEC by ActBlue and the ACTUAL aggregate amount give by Zoski, Glenn as of that donation
Let’s try a second example, a person whose name shows over five donations made just on 12/31/2022, Kristen Zeller, and search by her name with the committee recipient ActBlue. Exported to csv and sorted by date 2022, it shows that in her name, donations totalling 11389.16 were made in 2002 to ActBlue. Her employer is listed as not employed.
A third name, again, not employed, in whose name thousands of donations were made to ActBlue in 2022, is Patricia Young. Exported to csv, sorted by date 2022, it shows that in her name, donations totalling 8570.26 were made in 2022.
To try and track down the total amounts donated using these suspicious transactions to ActBlue in 2022, let’s search by employer “unemployed” “not employed” and “retired”. Let’s narrow it to donations between 1-199 and narrow by California, and further narrow by only January of 2022.
The mainstream media, of course, immediately went to find a republicans are bad or worse angle to the story, and came up with that winred “did the same thing”. Winred of course, did not do the same thing. Winred did sneakily precheck the “make this donation a monthly donation” on the donation page, and then continued to take the originally donated amount each month. If people noticed and were against it, it was refunded. It went up to 12 times, because it would repeat every month . This is sneaky , but not illegal, because the donation was in their name legally because the donor just failed to notice the prechecked “make this a repeat donation” checkbox, but agreed to it by pressing next or whatever when they submitted their original donation to winred. This, in fact, happened to my husband.
We did not realize it was prechecked, and so once a month they took another 35 dollars from the account. We are to blame for not checking the bank records, and really, by the time we noticed, we were like, well, it did go to a good cause, let’s not ask for a refund, that was sneaky, and from then on unchecked it and it has never been taken again.
Even within the zoski 2022 dataset, the doinations to winred number 40 (which is a plausible amount, as many Trump supporters DID give 40 times in 2016 or 2020, more importantly, the reported aggreagate amount for this column WAS correct. So Winred properly reported it. ActBlue did not.
That is much different from what actblue did
Update as of 4/25/23: I heard on Zack paine’s redpill news broadcast of Saturday, where Madjewski who is running as rep for Ohio stated that he’s heard that ActBlue has or is about to declare bankruptcy, and if they do, as soon as they do, all the data about the receipts of individual donations will be wiped. He was doing his best to get a court order freezing those records. Please for once don’t let the eels wiggle away.
And what kind of a crazy records policy is that? All you have to do to get away with campaign finance fraud is simply collect it, then if caught, immediately declare bankruptcy placing all your records out of the reach of the justice system? What? Yes, so then all they’d have to indict on would be the publicly accessible side of the records – the database we can all search now. But if a justice department got their side of the data then they could see which card or account each of those transactions was run on.
Madjewski was explaining that he expects it is a function of the waterfall as it is called in the business, whereby the software is programmed before any donations are accepted so that the donation amount goes to the candidate up to the individual contribution limit as if the donor had actually earmarked it so, and then any amount over that goes to the committee, to which individuals are allowed to make unlimited donations, and then the waterfall goes to the various distribution channels that the software is programmed to do. So he said he thinks it is not just actblue, but it is the fundraising class, as they get commission based on how much they raise, yet they dont have skin in the game (and apparently, they can pass the blame to the committee for how they programmed the earmarked extra funds to be distributed).
This is so massive I am speechless, and now to find out they could just wipe all the records based on declaring bankruptcy. What a racket. Zack told Madjewski to reach out to Senator Rubio who is all fired up about this and wants the FEC to investigate. Don’t trust them to investigate – want this to go to the DOJ. Come on where are all the prosecutors. This is federal one of you must be honest, as Zack said. Please let them get frozen and not disappeared.
Anyway, so back to researching the actblue and Winred data.
ActBlue : In 2019-2020 and 2021-2022, the individual donations to act blue made by individuals with the employer “unemployed” “retired” or not employed alone totalled 51,931,000 transactions (of which 19,616,000 were unemployed or not employed, and 35,572,000 marked retired). Including None as employer brought the total up to 57,660,000. In just 2019-2020, those with the employer unemployed” “retired” or not employed totalled 29,052,000 entries (of which 19,721,000 were marked retired, 10,818,000 unemployed or not employed).
For Winred, the transactions made by people with the emploiyer “unemployed” “retired” or not employed totalled 8,193,000 entries in 2019-2020 (of which 5,562,000 were marked retired, 3,051,000 unemployed or not employed). For the same employer type in 2019-2020 and 2021-2022 combined, the total transactions totalled 16,495,000 (of whichcgh 6,243,000 were marked unemployed or not employed and 11,313,000 were marked retired.) If none was included as employer, the total increased to 18,226,000.
Okay, but here’s the weird thing. When I narrow the search to just 12/1/2019 – 12/31/2019, I get 903,000 for actblue and about half that for winred. And actblue AND winred has multiple tiny donations (starting with 5 cents) multiple times a day for some contributors. However, when I searched by one contributor name after seeing their name repeatedly donate a tiny amount multiple times on one day – and then widened the search to 2019-2020, the winred donor, Chrisandra Willoughby, gave a total of while the actblue donor Gladys Bransford, gave a total of times in the amount of.
The data exported from the FEC website put into sheets shows that for 2019-2020 and 2021-2022, Gladys Bransford donation transactions to actblue total 1913 if she’s tghe one living at the address google maps can’t find a home for at 9495 Hoberg Drive. The other one at 43300 LITTLE RIVER AIRPORT ROAD had 9359 donations transacted in her name from 2019-2022. in 2021 they totalkled 7432 dollars.
For the same time period for our Winred donor Chrisandra Willoughby, there are 38 donations to winred out of 90 donations in the same time period. for all four years they totalled just over 435.50 dollars
This is a little outline of just some of the things I have read lately that genuinely horrify and chill me and which I feel are abominations. These are the sorts of things that seem to instantly suggest to the mind consequences in the hands of “bad actors” and of course, no really good things in the hands of even well controlled proper minded and behaviored actors.
They pop up in patent applications, and in general articles read or mentioned.
Here is the outline of the ones I remember at the moment
mentioned by redpill78 – that in Japan they recently just created a mouse? embryo by combining a y and a y gamete. Normally the y is in the sperms that will go onto create a male baby in the sperm from the male and the x is in the egg from the female. Thus they will be able to create a baby from two males, or a male and a “trans” woman which they are pretending is a biological woman lately. I am surprised to see this from Japan, as I thought they liked normal things there, and weren’t on board with this whole trans as a thing the government shoves down your throat, gender is an option or fluid or an idea. The problem with this is it is messing with what has been created by millions of years of evolution (and therefore reflects Nature or god) and messes with it – in the creation of life!!! And it will be used to devalue women, who are no longer necessary to the creation of life. This seems to tie in with the girls (who are likely lesbians or autistic most of them) being agreed with when they sayt they are trans and encouraged to get pansalpyngoooferopanhysterectomies to become “male”.
A creepy patent Jessica rose pointed out which involved having something in the cells that can be remotely monitored or activated to create a behavior response. It is introduced as being used because sometimes people’s psychological misgivings about receiving the covid vax cause them to lose sleep – either before or after the “vaccine” is given to them and this interrupts the amazing vaccines ability to help, so this patented product/process works in the cells of the person to monitor if they are getting enough sleep , and also can be remotely activated to induce sleep by inducing some sort of pattern likely to induce the brain waves needed for sleep. Sounds like it could be remotely turned on and like hypnotize you, and it is just like why would you even think of that patent? And as for losing sleep over the vaccine, I can see why since this was the most shocking example of how the whole world of governments could be made to bend the knee and do something reckless in lock step fashion, exactly meeting the desired social goals of the WEF and the globalists and making the nefarious ones involved in creating it billions and billions which is now added to the debt we all have to be taxed to pay the interest on. And that no one in power stopped this is a good reason to lose sleep. But don’t worry, there’s a patent to remotely hypnotize you and put you to sleep!
And talk about horrifying, while all these adverse reactions are showing up even in vaers which is underreported by a factor of 21-41, what is the vaccine advisory committee doing? Not just approving it for 5-11 year olds, approving it for infants, and then finishing that up with making the companies who already made billions able to make more and worse remain completely liability free forever, by adding the covid “vaccine” to the childhood vaccine schedule, right down to that. Steve Kirsch saw that coming a long time ago. I remember him saying, “let’s be honest, the end goal is to get the vaccine added to the childhood vaccine schedule thus providing liability shield forever, they won’t stop til they have achieved this goal” And they did. To say nothing of the fact that maybe the reason they are not responding to the vaccine is that vis a vis covid-19 the virus, the vaccine actually doesn’t prevent getting it or prevent transmitting it as even the makers of it admit now. Plus it in fact reduces the effectiveness of the immune system in an increasing fashion with every shot or booster and also each shot causes a 7% rise in excess deaths( so you are 28% more likely to die if you took 4 shots.)
Collaborating with virologists from a communist regime and teaching them highly advanced techniques that enable the lab created viruses to be way more dangerous to humans and then also sharing with them actual american people’s dna (by sending the PCR tests to china to be performed by their labs – each of those nasal swabs for sure contained dna of the person as you recall they scraped around roughly when taking the sample) In combination, this would provide them with a database of millions of american dnas they could map and then the the technological understanding and i presume we also gave them the equipment for their labs in China, and the understanding to make the viruses very dangerous to humans. Why wouldn’t they be able to combine these two concepts and make viruses able to target specifically to certain races of DNA by noting which gene pairs appeared regularly in certain of the races in america but did not appear in the chinese dna and then making the virus able to target those particular pairs? This info comes from the recent book by Dr. A. Duff.
for some reason it won’t let me put the address so i’ll do it as hyperlink here.
5. The whole list of things that are wrong on a microbiology level by Jessica Rose in the speech she gave at a conference about the pandemic response. I will try and list them but I can only access it on the phone where I watched it. Unless it is on youtube? Doubt it. And just everything else about the covid vaccines which were for a disease that had a very low fatality rate, and the vaccine a very low effectiveness rate, but had the bad result of inducing higher mortality. Along with pregnant women being pressured to take the vaccine and being told it was safe for pregnanat women when there were none in the trials – aaaaaahhhh!
On rumble, Mr. Jones breaks it down – “Patriots in arizona call for a new legitimate midterm election on december 6. Just like in Houston Texas and just like in key areas of Georgia and key areas of Pennsylvania and key areas of Michigan, and Nevada – on the day of the election, last Tuesday, MAGICALLY, the computers failed, or there wasn’t enough printer paper, or ink – at the republican facilities, none of the democrats. Like Kari Lake said, she went and voted at a democrat facility, no problems. Democrat jurisdiction, democrat precinct.
Tonight’s ballots from washoe county pushed democrat cisco aguilar into a lead over gop secretary of state candidate jim Marchant, which will hold. If Finchem loses az- down by 109k votes right now, every “America First” sec state candidate will have lost (tweet by David Weigei)
and guess what happened, ladies and gentlemen? The cameras, as you know, failed overnight in the one county that magically produced the ballots that they needed to be able to have them win in that critical race in that state, or multiple races in multiple states.
Isn’t that just darling? And of course, here’s a screenshot there in Maricopa county – look who was inside the ballot rooms – Katie Hobbs, time stamped too. So there she is at 10:07 at night inside the special center where when the machines failed in the republican precincts, they shipped them by truck to this special center which then of course found the votes needed so she (Hobbs) could win.
a search on rumble for midterm election fraud showed video of a news website during the first 30-40 minutes of the New York election. It showed that for the counties where the results were showing the republican candidate winnning, the exact same number of votes were shown for the two candidates. The results came from the decision desk hq api – one of the 7 “trusted ” election results data sources which gets the results directly from when they are counted.
This, as you know, is an impossibility, for there to be 8 counties with the republican Lee Zeldin getting 34,311 of the votes and Kathy Hechel getting 20,064
You’ll notice of course, that not only has the Clinton county numbers changed – both dropping below what was shown on election night nov. 9, but the overall votes are 2.9 million for one candidate and 2.6 million for the other. Yet on election night, the totals showed 4.7 million for Hochel and 1.8 million for Zeldin. I guess they are not even trying to make it believable anymore. Numbers no longer matter, except the ones that the news announces as true.
and i would point out that not only do many dems like pelosi schumer feinstein etc act like they will win guaranteed, they also act like they are never going to die. while most of that preboomer generation are gone ie, all gen x’s grandparents, and even some of our parents—these people are in their 80s and dont even act like death crosses their mind at all. and their wealth? surely more than they admit just ike obamma somehow bought ahouse in marthas vineyard for 500 million, whered he get that?
did you know jeffrey epstein was worth over 500 million when he died? i wonder who else has shares in those companies? I wish we could see theinterlocking subversion surely demonstrated by the finances of these demons. and no one will stop them at the doj. so it is pretty depressing.
heres a great read from california globe
57.7 % – That’s How Many Californians Officially Don’t Care
There was no red wave Tuesday night, so the question of whether or not it would finally crest the Sierras became moot even before California’s polls closed.
In the statewide races, those candidates with a “D” next to their name – despite their gross incompetence, ethical ickiness, and/or obvious naked self-interest – all won rather easily.
As of this writing, Gavin Newsom got 57.7% of the vote, a comfortable number, but also a fascinating one. That’s because it is exactly the same percentage that, on average, the other, save one, state office candidates got.
Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Secretary of State, Attorney General, Treasurer, and Insurance Commissioner – their average vote was 57.7% of the electorate, with a high of 58.1% and a low of 57.2% bookending the races.
Lanhee Chen – despite being vastly more qualified than opponent Malia Cohen and actually being endorsed by major newspapers and having enough money to be competitive and running a strong campaign – cut that number by 4 points – Cohen got 53.7% – but only by 4 points. In other words, running an essentially best-case-scenario campaign netted Chen only an extra 260,000 or so votes compared to other weaker and/or poorly funded and/or no hope Republicans.
Both Alex Padilla’s Senate victory – he got 59% – and Tony Thurmond’s unconscionable re-election with 62% involved somewhat different dynamics – the federal aspect for Padilla and the hysterically theoretical non-partisan nature of the Superintendent of Public Instruction office can account for the slightly different results.
What this means is that 57.7% of Californians are, for all practical purposes, incapable of getting beyond base party identification, aggressively not paying attention, and utterly uninterested in the reality of the state.
While that is extremely encouraging for the one-party oligarchy that runs California, that does not bode well for the future of the state. In other words, the Sacramento Blob can sleep safely tonight, while 42.3% of Californians are thinking about sleeping safely in another state as soon as they can.
Now, it may still be possible – kinda sorta-ish possible – that Republicans will see gains in the statehouse, but whether or not they will be enough to end the Democrat’s super-majority in the Assembly is not yet clear.
On a positive note, at this point it seems that multiple congressional seats are still in play for Republican gains.
And on a very weird note, there is Los Angeles. Extremely troublingly – the county tossed out Sheriff Alex Villanueva, the one elected official who actually did something about the city’s homeless problem but the city still might elect developer Rick Caruso – who campaigned hard on the same issue – its mayor.
Caruso currently has about a 3 point lead over LA machine-made Karen Bass, though, as has been seen before, that may change. But while “Angelenos,” as the departing, but not to India, Eric Garcetti would say, may very well have chosen an independent, not beholden to the machine, and business-oriented mayor, it also appears they elected the certifiable, hard left, recommended by the Los Angeles chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America Kenneth Mejia.
The LA-Democratic Socialists of America had other successes Tuesday, with actual DSA member Hugo Soto-Martinez (a prime suspect in the leaking of the infamous Nury Martinez, et. al. racism tape) poised to win his city council race and its “recommended” (the DSA, for some obscure reason almost assuredly tied to the byzantine internal organizational structures of every leftist group ever, distinguishes between endorsements and recommendations) candidate Katy Young Yaroslavsky taking hers.
The other two council races saw contradictory results. On the plus side, tough-on-homelessness Traci Parks put the final dagger in outgoing Councilman Mike Bonin’s political career by defeating his pro-current homelessness situation acolyte Erin Darling.
On the flip side, Tim McOsker – such a machine creature he could have been built to spec – will take a seat on the council. Not only does McOsker ooze status quo – he’s so inside he’s practically politically agoraphobic – he is an actual real-life honest-to-God member of the homeless-industrial complex, serving on the board of Linc Housing, an organization that uses public money to build “supportive” housing for the homeless.
The sun will rise tomorrow – whether or not it has set on California forever is up in the air.
Note – the specific numbers referenced in this article may change but the main premise will not.
Thomas Buckley is the former Mayor of Lake Elsinore and a former newspaper reporter. He operates a small communications and planning con
‘We are well aware’: Several machines down, multiple issues reported at Harris County polling location
HOUSTON – Multiple issues have been reported at polling locations in Harris County this Election Day, according to Harris County Elections.
KPRC 2 has learned that the Metropolitan Multi-Service Center, located at 1475 W. Gray St., has been experiencing “serious computer problems” this morning and only two machines were working at 7 a.m., according to a manager at the location.
The manager told KPRC 2 there were no previous issues reported during early voting.
When KPRC 2 photog Cesar Martinez left the location, a total of 10 out of 50 ballot machines were reportedly working, Martinez said.
Harris County Elections has acknowledged that issues have been reported from multiple polling locations across the county.
A spokesperson for Harris County Elections sent the following statement to KPRC 2 in regard to the issues:
“We are well aware of the issues and we have had all hands on deck to answer the support lines for our election workers to get things resolved as quickly as possible.”
KPRC will be reporting any issues that we see here, so continue to check back for more updates as they become available.
Are you having any issues while trying to cast a ballot? Give us a call during our Election Day phone bank in collaboration with the League of Women Voters Houston and Telemundo Houston at (713) 778-8920 (English) or (713) 778-8930 (Spanish).
Polls are open from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. on Election Day. If you registered to vote by Oct. 11 and meet all other requirements, you have a right to cast a ballot as long as you’re in line at a polling location by 7 p.m.
For more information on polling locations and wait times, go to
HOUSTON – Multiple issues have been reported at polling locations in Harris County this Election Day, according to Harris County Elections.
KPRC 2 has learned that the Metropolitan Multi-Service Center, located at 1475 W. Gray St., was experiencing “serious computer problems” Tuesday morning and only two machines were working at 7 a.m., according to a manager at the location.
The manager told KPRC 2 there were no previous issues reported during early voting.
When KPRC 2 photog Cesar Martinez left the location, a total of 10 out of 50 ballot machines were reportedly working, Martinez said.
A spokesperson for Harris County Elections sent the following statement to KPRC 2 in regard to the issues:
“We are well aware of the issues, and we have had all hands on deck to answer the support lines for our election workers to get things resolved as quickly as possible.”
That afternoon, Harris County Elections Administrator Clifford Tatum addressed concerns and issues that occurred at various locations.
“Some of it has to do with the manner of which it was set up, some of it has to do with perhaps the printers not doing what it was supposed to do,” Tatum said. “But the good news is that voters are voting. I was just informed that we’ve had at least 120,000 today as of noon time and we’d like to remind our voters that the polls are open until 7 p.m.”
Tatum also reminded registered voters that there are 782 locations.
“If you get to one particular location and the line seems to be longer than you care to endure, you can go to Harrisvotes.com and look up the closest polling location, he said.
Tatum also explained that they were working to fix the issues with machines.
“There’s a location at Baker Ripley where the judge had a mishap with a supply box and the key to the machines which then delayed the opening of that location,” he said.
A technician and supplies were sent to the site to help the judge get set up. Tatum said it was then discovered that some of the clerks assigned to work at that location decided not to work that day, so they had to send additional resources and clerks to help out.
“The good news is that while voters are there waiting, there were other locations within the vicinity they could have driven themselves to,” Tatum said. “The long and the short of it is we have to control the things that we can. We need to control our supplies a little better, control our access a little better and those are things we will assess post-election to ensure we get it right the next time.”
Tatum said there were no reports of any voter intimidation or coercion and assured that everyone who wanted to cast a ballot would be able to.
Polls are open on Election Day from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. If you registered to vote by Oct. 11 and meet all other requirements, you have a right to cast a ballot as long as you’re in line at a polling location by 7 p.m.
For more information on polling locations and wait times, go to www.harrisvotes.com.
Tracking potential issues at voting centers, ballot drop-off locations
PHOENIX — Polling centers are open until 7 p.m. across Arizona and ABC15 is tracking issues at voting centers and ballot drop-off locations.
In the morning and early afternoon, voters reported long lines and some machines that weren’t accepting ballots at various locations across the Valley.
Election officials held a news conference just before 9 a.m. addressing additional tabulation center issues. There are 223 polling locations in Maricopa County, they said about 20% of voting centers were having issues with tabulation machines.
As of 2 p.m., Maricopa County Elections officials say they’ve identified a solution to the problem, which impacted about 60 voting centers. County officials say the issue was a printer setting. “It appears some of the printers were not producing dark enough timing marks on the ballots,” officials stated in a release. “This solution has worked at 17 locations, and technicians deployed throughout the county are working to resolve this issue at the remaining locations.”
A press conference addressing the issue was held Tuesday afternoon. Watch in the player below:
Seeing a potential issue at your polling center? Let us know by sending an email to share@abc15.com.
A procedure has also been put in place for issues like this where ballots can be inserted in Door #3. Those ballots will be counted later by a bipartisan team, election officials say.
“Even when we did have this active issue, still, there was no one who came today with a valid I.D. who was turned away from the polls,” Bill Gates with the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors said. “Those people were given a ballot, they were given the opportunity to fill out the ballot, and then if the ballot was not going through this tabulator, they then had the option to put it down here in box number three, or also we’ve been giving people the option to check out, if they wanted to, if they were uncomfortable putting the ballot there in box three, and then they could go to one of the other 222 vote centers across Maricopa County.”
OTHER ISSUES REPORTED:
Shortly after opening at 6 a.m., the Burton Barr Library voting location in Phoenix reported it was acting as a ballot drop-off-only site due to tabulation center issues. Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer told ABC15 it was a “small issue” that was not impacting the ability of voters to cast their ballots. It was resolved at that center shortly after 7 a.m.
Maricopa County officials said, in that instance: “Poll workers put in the password incorrectly on the tabulators three times and they were locked out. This is a security feature designed to protect the vote. We’ve sent a tech to get the tabulators up and running. Voters can still check in and vote their ballot. But in the interim, voters have a few options. They can wait for the tech to bring out a new password and memory cards, they can insert their voted ballots into a secure door in the ballot box and bipartisan poll workers will insert their ballots into the tabulator at the end of the night, or they can choose to vote at another location.”
“None of this indicates any fraud,” Bill Gates with the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors said.
The “safe and effective” narrative is falling apart
Here is my list of over 50 leading indicators that the momentum is moving in our favor. I’d be surprised if the narrative doesn’t fall apart soon. It’s now unravelling quickly in the UK.
Here is my list of nearly 100 indicators that the “safe and effective” narrative is falling apart.
It is a devastating list.
And for some reason, nobody wants to fact check me on it.
It will take you 42 minutes to read everything which is too long for most people, so feel free to pick and choose what you read to get a sense for the entire list.
This is a “kitchen sink” article listing some of the best examples showing that the narrative is falling apart.
Feel free to create derivative works of this list (e.g., pick your set of the most compelling arguments). Feel free to stop reading this list at any time after reading any of the articles.
The latest most damaging paper, by Joseph Fraiman and Peter Doshi entitled “Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults” survived peer-review and is now finally published. It points out that when you look at the serious adverse events reported in the Phase 3 clinical trials for Pfizer and Moderna, there is cause for concern. To do a proper analysis, they need release of the participant-level trial data, something that should be normally supplied but isn’t. The paper says, “Full transparency of the COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial data isneeded to properly evaluate these questions. Unfortunately, aswe approach 2 years after release of COVID-19 vaccines, participant level data remain inaccessible.” In short, these authors are pissed that Pfizer and Moderna won’t release the data an are not being transparent with the public or the regulators.
Here’s something I see all the time: an increase in death rates after the vaccines rolled out (in this case, a 3% death rate). I’ve seen similar stats for Wayne Root’s wedding and my survey of 600 people. But I never see any anecdotes where people were dying before the vaccine but then all the deaths stopped after the vaccines rolled out:
Read this post about Wayne Root. He basically did the post-marketing randomized clinical trial that the CDC never did. Only 200 people were “enrolled” in his “trial” which lasted just 8 months. The results are stunning: 26 injuries and 7 deaths, but ONLY of the vaccinated. The unvaxxed had no issues at all.
When I looked for anecdotal data supporting the vaccines (stories like Wayne Root’s, but in reverse where it is ONLY the unvaxxed who were dead or injured), I couldn’t find any! Apparently, I am not alone. Perhaps the fact checkers can help find these anecdotes
This “problem” is happening everywhere. The only question is whether people are paying attention. Read this post by Anita Jader. She’s paying attention. Have you ever seen a post like this in your life? Do you think this is “normal”?
The previous CDC director is speaking out about the misconduct now. “I’ve been very disappointed in the scientific community led by [National Institutes of Health] that has really dug their heels in from the beginning to try to minimize any of us that have a different hypothesis,” he said.
Not good even for old people. We now know from the UK data that the vaccines kill more people than they help even for those over 60. Look at how much larger the kill rate was in the first 21 days vs. >21 days. It’s stunning. A safe vaccines does not do that! Even Robert Malone finally admitted that the elderly should not get vaccinated. Watch this video at 6:50.
Wayne Root reported that 33 guests at his wedding who are now sick or dead were all vaccinated. The punchline: virtually all his guests were unvaccinated. So that’s unexplainable. He wrote: “It’s important to note, I’m a conservative talk show host who has warned LOUDLY of the dangers of the vaccine since day one. So, my friends are overwhelmingly conservative and unvaccinated too. Yet the few friends I know who did choose to vaccinate are almost all dead or ill.” And he said, “Among my friends and family who are unvaccinated, not one of them has died or been sick since my wedding eight months ago.” The article has a list of 8 headlines from TMZ of serious injury/death and then he points out: “These were all headlines in one day this week!” So Wayne isn’t just having bad luck. Bad luck is in the newspaper.
4X increase in long term disability for airline pilots. The pilots union at a major US airline internally reports a 300 percent rise in long-term disability claims this year among its members, who are nearly all vaccinated. That’s statistically very unlikely. It couldn’t be COVID. What is novel that would have affected most of the pilots? Hmmmm…
A huge number of people in comedy are dying, 22 since September 2021. These deaths are easy to track since they are in plain sight.
This is a huge Black Swan event: 5 doctors in Ontario (plus one in Saskatchewan) died within 2 weeks of getting the 4th dose of the vaccine. Here are the stories: First three, fourth, fifth in Ontario, sixth in Saskatchewan. Number of unexpected deaths in 2020: zero (that I know of). These are happening everywhere of course, but are being buried. It would have been buried in Ontario as well, but someone put together the pattern. Notice this isn’t on any mainstream media. “[The] cause of death wasn’t shared in the memo, but how many times have 3 doctors died in 1 week, days after the hospital started administering the 4th shot to staff.” In the Greater Toronto area, there are now 7 deaths of doctors in a two week period. There are normally 0 unexpected deaths like this in a year. All the doctors were vaccinated with a fourth dose of the vaccine. See also: Four doctors in Ontario died right after the fourth dose.
See “Open your eyes. This is happening everywhere.” The subhead says: Pushback over the deaths in Scotland and Italy; Wayne Allan Root has lost 33 friends—all “vaccinated”—to death or illness in the last 18 months; & TV presenter Kate McCann keels over, live!
It’s happening in Ireland too! How can heart disease explode in kids only after they roll out the vaccines for kids? Experts are baffled as to what might be causing a sudden increase in heart disease for kids that is happening only in places that have rolled out the COVID vaccines for kids. It’s not happening to kids anymore in Uruguay for some reason (perhaps the judge stopping the vaccine program might have something to do with it).
Unknown causes is now the leading cause of death in Alberta, Canada. It wasn’t that way before the vaccines rolled out. The experts dismiss that as “oh, that’s because people who have had COVID are more susceptible of dying.” But why would they be more susceptible of dying of UNKNOWN causes? And why is it only the vaccinated who are dying of the the unknown causes? And if this is due to the COVID infection, how come it isn’t happening in any country with a low COVID vaccination rate? And how do the experts explain the strange blood clots only found in vaccinated people? The press still forgets to ask these critical questions. But at least mainstream media is covering the mystery cause of deaths. It’s a start. But they are allowing “hand-waving” explanations when the “experts” are just making this stuff up with no data to back it up. Any “expert” who actually talks to patients knows the side effects of the vaccine are far greater than those from COVID. So how is our “expert” not even considering the vaccine as a possibility? We see the headlines almost on a daily basis now of celebrities dying “unexpectedly” of “unknown” causes so this “new” category being #1 shouldn’t be a surprise anymore. And I guarantee you that it is happening to boatloads of “lesser known” people as well: those people don’t generate the headlines. But have you ever in your life read about so many “unexpected” causes of death? I got two sent to me just today: Busi Lurayi (age 36 died suddenly) and rapper Tumi Tladi (age 30, died in his sleep). Two in a day, both international celebrities from South Africa?!?! What are the chances of that happening randomly?
There was a 163% rise in life insurance claims at Lincoln National, but that article didn’t take into account that there was a merger (which is why premiums also went up). They are the fifth largest insurance company in the US. The correct number to focus on is the loss ratio which went up industry wide. The loss ratio is what to focus on. Q4 21 industry wide saw a 40% increase over 2019 loss ratio and leveled off to about 20-25% in Q1. I am hearing that there is still a mix shift in Q2 from old to young still and that excess mortality has come down some. That isn’t COVID. COVID doesn’t kill anywhere close to that number of people. We are looking at the biggest killer in history and nobody can figure out what it is! Watch this video. You will never see a story on this on mainstream media; they ignore it. Note, part of the claims increase is due to premium increases (adding new clients).
Watch the video here of OneAmerica CEO Scott Davison. The fact checkers claim all these excess deaths are due to COVID and deferred medical treatments. But the 18-64 year olds rarely die from COVID, so it can’t be COVID. And if it deferred medical care, this should slowly ramp up gradually over time and start falling as people went back into the office. It should spike like that. So the explanations don’t fit. And they don’t explain the hundreds of anomalies described here and in my misinformation spreader article. If all the deaths are from those two causes, why do my surveys done by professional polling companies consistently show as many people dying from COVID as from the vaccine?
Life insurance companies in countries all over the world are reporting record numbers of excess deaths. These are not “statistical fluctuations.” The deaths are all caused by a huge intervention that is affecting the health of millions of people. And it’s all new. Nothing like this ever happened before 2021. Nothing of this magnitude has EVER happened in their history (which goes back over 100 years).
Nobody will answer any of the questions I posted in my article on how to stop misinformation. The longer this goes on, the more suspect people will become.
GoFundMe deaths from stroke and other unusual causes in YOUNG people are through the roof. One reader wrote: “I heard on my local radio about a go fund me for a lady that was stuck in Tasmania because she had a massive stroke on holidays so I decided to look it up, the amount of GoFundMe pages for young people and children who have had stokes was mind boggling, also a heap of pages for adverse reactions to the vax.”
In May, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration released its early estimate of traffic fatalities for 2021 and projected a 10.5 percent increase from the 38,824 fatalities in 2020 and an 18 percent increase from 2019. I know of a guy that predicted what he called “Vaxidents” due to drivers with brain impairment caused by the you know what. Seems to be a correlation.
How can casket makers for child caskets suddenly see a 400% rise in demand right after the vaccines are announced for kids? It’s supposed to be the reverse that happens: a dramatic drop in business. Instead it is the inverse. How will they ever explain THAT one? They can’t so it will never be covered in mainstream media. Read Etana Hecht’s story about one of the largest North American casket manufacturers reporting a 400% increase in child-sized caskets since December 2021 or this article, “UNPRECEDENTED ORDERS of CHILD SIZED COFFINS.” They’re being bought in bulk for the first time after 30 years of being in business. Could it be a coincidence? The story says the funeral directors all see the connection… the funeral directors all know the vaccine is killing the kids but they are not allowed to talk about it since it would be bad for business to be anti-vax. The government covers the cost for the vaccine, but doesn’t compensate anyone for the loss of their child or even the funeral costs. That’s how caring our government is.
Even John Campbell, who is pro-vaccine, admits that a troubling number of unexplained excess deaths are not just happening in the UK: they are happening worldwide. Just listen to the first 30 seconds of this video. Of course, the CDC isn’t investigating anything even though American life insurance companies are reporting deaths that are off-the-charts. The CDC is NEVER going to investigate this. It’s bigger than COVID and they know full well what it is. That’s why they are NOT going to investigate and The NY Times is NEVER going to fault them for this. After all, it’s only the biggest medical cause of death in our history.
The overall shift in the cause of death from respiratory to cardiac is impossible to ignore and can’t be explained if the vaccines are “safe and effective.” A friend of mine who lives in Massachusetts noticed this after he made a FOIA request for the death records in Massachusetts. He looked at the ICD-10 coded causes of deaths and noticed that the causes of deaths shifted from primarily “J codes” (respiratory due to COVID) to “I codes” (circulatory due to the vaccine). Now we learn that the exact same thing happened in the UK in 2021 according to official UK government numbers. This is a huge effect and there must be a cause, but the health authorities are simply baffled and cannot explain it (because they are not permitted to blame the vaccine since that would make everyone look bad). It’s safe to say that such a shift has never happened before in history. Clearly, something new happened starting in 2021 that affected massive numbers of people worldwide. I wonder what that might have been? Health authorities simply cannot come up with a single thing that was new in 2021.
The vaccine injuries of toddlers who are now having seizures cannot be explained. This is now a regular occurrence for 2 and 3-year-old kids to have seizures. It’s only happening in vaccinated kids and most often between 2 and 5 days of vaccination from the COVID vaccine. Doctors are not allowed to report these events publicly (they are not allowed to share on social media or talk to the press) so each doctor thinks it is simply a “one-off” event that is ONLY happening to them. If doctors would be allowed to speak publicly, they would realize the massive pattern. This is why hospitals muzzle the doctors: so nobody finds out. We have multiple reports of these from nurses directly from nurses who are scared that their social media accounts are being monitored. The parents are told that it is just “bad luck” and the parents believe what they are told. So the parents don’t speak out about it either.
Countries are starting to realize birth rates are dropping and there are more stillbirths. Sweden, the UK, Germany, etc. See my article about birth rates.
Move along! Nothing to see here folks.
The deaths and injuries are happening in plain view of everyone with no plausible explanation for all the coincidences. All of the events are only happening to vaccinated people, but because the press never mentions the vaccination status of the people who “die unexpectedly,” the public never realizes the pattern:
Think about all the rock concerts that have been terminated or canceled due to medical reasons. Justin Bieber, Santana, … Brett Michaels. They never give the cause as the vaccine so they have to make something up (Santana) or simply refuse to disclose it (Michaels). Someone sent me a list of four other concerts that were canceled within the past few months. This isn’t normal folks. But most people never attend rock concerts in different parts of the country so they never figure it out. Also, Santana cancelled six upcoming concerts to recover from dehydration. All the doctors I talked to said that makes no sense. Worst case he’d get IV fluids and be back to normal in a few hours. So the explanation doesn’t fit. But other celebrities are speaking out on their vaccine injuries such as Eric Clapton, but they aren’t well publicized (Clapton’s video has just 66,000 views as of July 11, 2022).
Think about all the celebrity deaths in 2021 and 2022. These are never covered up; they can’t be. What they never mention is the total number of unexpected deaths and they never mention the vaccination status of the deceased. But they can’t hide the total number. This is a good way to track whether excess deaths are increasing or decreasing because the government can’t fudge these numbers because they are in plain sight.
Young people virtually never die in their sleep. When you see this happening over and over, it’s no accident. When you see it happening to celebrities, it’s even more noticeable and impossible to cover up such as the death of Dani Hampson who died in her sleep on her wedding day. Not only was it a celebrity death but a “young person died in her sleep” death as well, a black swan. Many Americans realize what is going on. You can see this by looking at the Twitter comments.
Athletes are dying in plain sight at 22X the normal rate. Today, former NHL defenseman Bryan Marchment died “unexpectedly.” But few people are tracking this so they have no idea the rates are so much higher. It just seems a bit odd. They attribute really strange causes to these death like dying from “accidental heat stroke” in your own home. I checked with a nurse. This never happens. But we’re going to see a lot of this now.
Pilots are having events at unprecedented rates, but the airlines are refusing to screen the pilots for cardiac issues. When American Airlines Captain Bob Snow had a cardiac event right after he landed, he didn’t even get a call from the CEO of American Airlines. The FAA won’t require pilot screening. They know exactly what they would find. So they look the other way and say nothing and pretend these events never happened. The pilots know. Any member of the public with a working brain can figure this out. But we assume that the FAA is honest and will do the right thing. Big mistake. The FAA was officially put on notice and they have done absolutely nothing about it. They just ignored it like it never happened. Congress is doing the same: they aren’t holding the FAA accountable since they know it would make them look bad. Everyone is banking on nobody ever finding out. After all, they covered up the fact that the US government created the virus in the first place so the reasoning is that they can cover up all the cardiac events and pilot deaths.
Surveys (such as this one) consistently show that fewer than 50% of Americans are willing to get more shots of the vaccine. Most of America is clued in, even though none of the media people are. As a result, the government is throwing away tens of millions of vaccine doses due to insufficient demand (which is why Peter Marks of the FDA said he’d do anything except debate the opposition to reduce vaccine hesitancy. So basically we are literally throwing away billions of dollars of taxpayer money to produce a product nobody wants. Is anyone in Congress complaining about the government waste: No. Not a single person. Is anyone in the mainstream media pointing out this is stupid to order a product nobody wants? Nope. Nobody in mainstream media is going to publish an op-ed like that. They all just go along as if nothing is wrong.
People’s young healthy friends are having medical problems at unprecedented rates (though not everyone is realizing this). For example, today I learned that one of our country club employees (forced to vaccinate) that I knew died from a stroke at age 52. A young candidate for US Senate, John Fetterman, had a stroke following his vaccination. He may never recover.
Whenever we do audience surveys, every audience always reports a comparable or excess rate of death from the vaccine vs. COVID. So even if you don’t see it yourself, the live audience surveys are very convincing since there is no “bias” in these live surveys. Nobody but “misinformation spreaders” like myself are willing to do the surveys for some reason.
User surveys done by professional third party polling firms consistently show the vaccines have killed more people than COVID has. The NY Times, 60 Minutes, etc. all refuse to do the surveys themselves. They don’t want anyone to know. Our next step is to use a big name polling organization to promote this result so it is not coming from “anti-vaxxers.” That poll should be impossible for anyone to ignore. We have never run a single poll that shows everything is fine and the vaccines are perfectly safe. That is why the mainstream media will never do these polls. But most people don’t realize that the are deliberately not doing these polls. However, it may be hard for us to get this done. There have been far less devastating polls that have been done by the big polling firms and they refuse to allow the results to be used when they found out the result were against the narrative. The reason is simple: it would be bad for business to release such a poll because everyone would stop using them because they are “evil.” This is why the public never sees any polls on vaccine safety: the media won’t commission them and the pollsters won’t do them. We welcome being proved wrong on this!
Mandates are vanishing even though COVID rates are increasing. For example, see this story about what is happening in parts of Australia where they are backing off their former recommendations with no apologies whatsoever:
The evidence shows that COVID was created in a US government funded biolab. That’s the direct assessment of the chairman of the independent commission tasked with looking into the cause. Professor Jeffrey Sachs was responsible for the independent Lancet investigation. He said, “I chaired the commission for the Lancet for 2 years on Covid. I’m pretty convinced it came out of a US lab of biotechnology.” You will never find that statement anywhere on US mainstream media. How could that not be covered? But in this video, he also said that there is absolutely no interest in learning more, not from any country in the entire world. That tells you everything you need to know. How can there be no interest in learning more? The only way there can be no interest in learning more is if the US government did it. Check out this article in Science which tries to make Sachs look like the villain: “Fights over confidentiality pledge and conflicts of interest tore apart COVID-19 origin probe: Former members of The Lancet task force challenge why economist Jeffrey Sachs disbanded effort.” Sachs figures out Daszak is conflicted and Daszak won’t produce documents showing a conflict. So the panel sides with Daszak!!! It is completely stunning that nearly the whole panel is conflicted and corrupt. Sachs emerges as the hero here. He calls for further investigation by an unbiased commission due to the smoking gun evidence of a contract that was “supposedly” never funded. Nobody takes him up on it because he’s right; what they want is a corrupt investigation only. The contract fits the origin of COVID like a glove and Daszak’s defense is that the work “was not funded. Therefore, the work was not done. Simple.” But it’s not as simple as that (as the article points out). It seems very clear that Daszak is lying. I double-checked with a former EcoHealth Alliance employee who was in a position to know. He was unequivocal. You have to have data to get funding on these proposals. The bottom line is Peter Daszak shouldn’t be trusted since he’s in on it. There’s more, but we’ll leave it at that for now.
Vaccine injuries are now being compensated in other countries with large payouts, but not in America. We haven’t paid out a dime to anyone, despite thousands of applicants (most others know it is fruitless to apply and don’t bother). So how can the vaccines injure people outside of America, but not injure anyone who was given a shot inside America? That’s simply impossible if there isn’t a government cover-up. There is no third party oversight of the vaccine compensation program in America and nobody in Congress (except for Senator Ron Johnson) thinks that zero payouts to the millions of Americans who were killed, disabled, or injured is a problem.
The most extensive investigations ever done on a death, 14 months of intensive investigation, have proven that the vaccines kill people. 27-year-old Jack Last of Stowmarket was vaccinated on March 30, 2021 and died days later. It took 14 months of investigation to determine he was killed by the vaccine.
1. The group life claims come from a younger, employed demographic dying neither from COVID nor suicide
2. This group of largely millennials fed “a silent Vietnam War” body-count-wise (61,000 in 2021, how many insurance companies counted not stated)
3. The connection to the shots is demonstrated by the “hockey stick” plots of deaths versus time clearly marked by mandates and boosters: the smoking gun
4. CEOs who mandated the shots are reluctant to publicize their responsibility for killing their employees
5. The financial catastrophe will push these data into mainstream news sooner or later 6. Ed was working directly with actuaries and insurance executives specifically counting group life claims, not just deaths among the general population. The exponential rates of change marked by dates of vaccine roll out, mandate implementations and boosters nails the vaccine inference for these fatalities reported this way. The argument is hard to contest. “Smoking gun,” as he says. This is insurance industry hard data: money paid out. This is why this is so impressive and to-the-point.
7. There is no response from any fact checkers on this.
Former highly respected blue-pilled doctors like Dr. Naureen Shaikh in Sausalito have seen enough and are now willing to come out of the closet and speak about vaccine injuries even though it means the end of her career in medicine.
Articles written by respected scientists like Peter Doshi are slammed by people who refuse to be held publicly accountable for their remarks. Read this article by Professor Norman Fenton which summarizes the bogus arguments made to smear these scientists who are speaking the truth, “Response to Susan Oliver video “Antivaxxers fooled by p-hacking and apples to oranges comparison.” Almost definitely, the “Doshi paper” will not be published for reasons explained in this article by Phil Harper. Susan Oliver, who is remarkably inept, will not have a discussion with Fenton and it’s pretty obvious who is spreading the misinformation for anyone spending any time on this. Instead of challenging Fenton, Susan produces a second video. Susan summarized her view of the paper in this tweet (which included the link to the video) that was retweeted by people like Prof Sir David Spiegelhalter (a world renowned expert on probability and risk) and Prof Peter Hansen (Econometrician, Data Scientist, and Latene Distinguished Professor of Economics at UNC, Chapel Hill). Hansen and Spiegelhalter refuse to speak with Fenton as well. Fenton would LOVE to chat with any of these people in a recorded conversation so he can ask them key questions, but all of them are afraid to be challenged: they just throw stones and then go into hiding. That is how “science” works nowadays.
Two teenage boys die in their sleep in different states days after vaccination and the paper concludes that the deaths were caused by the vaccine. It’s published in a peer-reviewed medical journal. There is no coverage of this in the US mainstream media. The best we could find is this report on NTD News. Read the comments on that tweet including, “My friend’s mom woke up terrified, unable to breathe. Her husband was by her side and called 911 but she was gone via cardiac arrest. She took a booster the morning before this transpired. It hits especially hard to think a child, alone, went through this. Rips my heart out.” The US mainstream media will continue to ignore all these deaths so that when it happens to them people will just think it is just their “bad luck,” but these stories are leaking on alternate media.
The world’s most respected vaccine expert, Dr. Paul Offit, publicly admitted on a YouTube video that the whole FDA outside review process is a complete sham. The FDA doesn’t review the data, they hand the committee hundreds of pages right before the meeting (knowing that way they committee cannot review it), and then badger them to approve the vaccines without any efficacy data. Offit admitted that if there was a “hell no” option for his vote, that’s what he would have done. He effectively said the others on the committee are brain-dead because there was no efficacy data to justify approval: these committee members basically vote “yes” because that’s what they are expected to do and they want to stay on the committee. The government orders the drug even before they ask the FDA panel to review the data, proving the whole “review process” is a complete sham. Offit himself still hasn’t figured out the vaccines aren’t safe. He won’t have that discussion with anyone on our side. However, Paul Offit is completely oblivious to the fact that if there are no deaths, you can’t save any lives. For example, we know from the Massachusetts death data that there were zero deaths in 2020 and 2021 for ages 5 to 11 (there was just one death coded as a COVID death but we contacted the family and found out it wasn’t true). So how is there a “problem”? Nobody wants to talk about that. They don’t even know there were no deaths in a large state like Massachusetts.
Parents are getting wise to the scheme. Just 1.3% of eligible children under 5 have received one or two doses of a vaccine, according to data from the CDC (see this Epoch Times article for details on the failure of the CDC to dupe parents to inject their kids).
Pierre Kory told me a mainstream doc he knows admitted to him confidentially that attitudes are changing now. Doctors now realize they’ve been lied to, but nobody has the courage to speak out about it since they’d lose their license. So they keep quiet. But most of them know the vaccines are killing and injuring people of all ages.
One of my nurse friends said that when a child had a cardiac incident recently, the entire trauma department thought “vaccine injury” as soon as they heard there was a teenager with a cardiac issue. However, none of the members of the trauma department will ever acknowledge any of this publicly because they know they will be fired for admitting the truth.
Doctors are now willing to meet with members of Congress and brief them on what is going on. For example, I now have 25 doctors in California willing to risk their careers to speak out to members of Congress in California. These doctors work at hospitals all over California. It’s not local.
Public health officials are now willing to be interviewed by me. I have one coming up on Monday July 11. Can you believe that? A public health official that will answer questions from me! I can’t wait.
Alex Berenson was re-incarnated on Twitter. Twitter admits they removed him erroneously (after they told Alex that they had “carefully” reviewed his Tweets and found them problematic). All the rest of us in Twitter Heaven will miss having Alex around.
A BBC documentary cannot get a simple vaccine statistic correct (the percent unvaccinated). But to their credit, they corrected it after Professor Fenton pointed out the error. That is progress because it shows that the truth actually is starting to matter now! Susan Oliver is far worse than the host for the BBC show, Hannah Fry. Neither of them are ever going to debate Norman Fenton. Nobody will.
The journal Science tacitly admitted that they aren’t doing science anymore. We requested that they ask for a correction or retraction of an obviously flawed paper. The request was made by a highly respected UK Professor, Norman Fenton. They ignored him! In short, junk science is fine for their journal. I really think they should rename their journal to “Junk Science” as that would be more accurate. But it’s clear that they don’t care about accuracy. You can be sure they will stay quiet about this junk paper. That’s the way “science” works nowadays.
I spoke with the CEO of a hospital near me. As soon as I sent him information about the vaccine being dangerous and suggested he could be a world leader by being the first hospital CEO to admit the truth, he stopped talking to me. So it’s actually promising he even responded to me even though he isn’t anymore. None of them want to be the first. They all want to keep their jobs. Your life is not important to them.
I actually got a reporter from the San Jose Mercury News to respond to an email I sent. We’re actually still conversing. Boy, that’s a first.
Fact checkers are now all afraid of me. Why? Because I got smart and I now insist on recording all conversations. Now they all refuse to talk to me. Because truth isn’t their focus. Listen to this recording. After I made this recording, I’ve never been contacted by any fact checker. And yes, it was a legal recording; they don’t dispute that. Here’s the story and a link to the recording. Now, no fact checker will talk to me nor will they debate me on the facts. Darn.
The US public is NOT permitted to know what is inside the COVID vaccines. A FOIA to the British government confirmed “the full quantitative composition of all COVID-19 vaccines is exempt from FOI disclosure.” In Uruguay, a judge has ordered the vaccines halted until they disclose the contents. Here’s a story with more details on the situation in Uruguay. However, in the US, it’s perfectly fine to mandate vaccination of Americans with substances that people are not permitted to know about. The people doing the mandating don’t even know themselves what is inside the vaccine. They are completely clueless as well. That’s just how it works. After all, it’s important that the public (and the authorities doing the mandating) NOT know the true composition because if they knew, nobody would take it. That’s why it has to be kept secret. Get it? It’s for your own good. We basically have to trust the drug companies, even though they have a history of fraud and defective products. After all, if you can’t trust Pfizer, who can you trust? Doesn’t this make you want to trust them?
We are learning of huge conflicts of interest with up to $400M in payouts given to unknown people inside the US government. We know Fauci is one of the recipients because he refused to answer that question when Senator Rand Paul asked him. We are not allowed to know any of these details because it is considered confidential. In other words, it would not be in the public interest to have the conflicts of interest known for some reason. Watch this video at 7 minutes and 30 seconds from the start. The FOIA response is redacted as you can see. Senator Rand Paul wants to know. The rest of Congress: they think it is best if this is kept from the American people.
Post-market all-cause mortality data is the gold standard for a vaccine. We have that in the UK which tracked it. It went up by up to 6X according to UK ONS data. But our own CDC cannot find any signal here, even though the VAERS death numbers and Medicare death numbers are off the charts. When the CDC looked at the VAERS death data (the Hannah Rosenblum VAERS paper published in the Lancet) they said none of the excess deaths were caused by the vaccines but they never said what caused the deaths. Why didn’t anyone in the medical community or the press want to know the actual cause of the unprecedented number of excess deaths? The deaths were 50 times normal and no other vaccine has a jump in death rates, just this one. Why wouldn’t the CDC want to know why? And why does Martha Sharan prohibit me from talking to the authors? The CDC is supposed to help stop misinformation. I reached out to find the “correct” reason for the deaths and their response was to not talk to me. That doesn’t help correct the “misinformation.” I just want to know what caused all the excess deaths that only happened for the COVID vaccines. Is that too much to ask? Nobody else is asking the question, but it’s an important question to ask.
The pulmonary embolism rates were over 1,000X normal and we knew that in January 2021. As the article shows, the data was in plain sight of everyone. So how could this not have triggered a safety signal? It’s now July 12, 2022 and to this date, the CDC has never recognized that pulmonary embolism might be triggered by the vaccine. How is that possible? It’s one of the biggest, most obvious, and most serious safety signals being triggered in VAERS? The answer is simple: the people at the CDC and FDA aren’t monitoring the VAERS system. They are looking the other way.
The CDC isn’t releasing any data from their BEST database. Yeah, that’s what it’s really called. You can’t make that up. But because the data isn’t supportive, they never show us. It’s kept under lock and key. Nobody gets to look at it. You’d think if the vaccine worked as advertised, they’d be showing us the data. The fact that they don’t show us the BEST data… that has to be very troubling for anyone with a working brain.
They aren’t showing the public the Medicare all-cause mortality data. Did you know it is at an all-time high since right after they rolled out the vaccines? Of course you don’t know that because the CDC will not release that data and the press isn’t asking them about it. The only reason I know about it is because I was tipped off by an honest HHS employee (yeah, we actually found one insider who is livid about the cover-up).
The UK ONS data shows that all-cause mortality increases tremendously after each vaccination. If it isn’t the vaccine causing this, then what is causing it? It is a HUGE effect: up to a 6X increase in all-cause mortality after you get each shot compared to unvaccinated in similar age groups. Nobody will explain this on camera. They are all camera shy. Nobody dares to challenge Professor Norman Fenton on this. The CDC thinks the opposite is happening, that the vaccine makes you nearly immortal, lowering your risk of death to absurdly low levels. Someone is lying to you. I can safely guarantee to you that the CDC is lying because the all-cause mortality rates are so low in the CDC’s VSD study that the vaccine even prevents you from dying in accidents!
There is a very real potential that the vaccine can integrate into a person’s DNA permanently. See Sweden Study Shows COVID Jab Can Modify DNA, Opens Doors for New Lawsuits. The vaccine might be permanently modifying your DNA and not for the better. They said this couldn’t happen, but now it is a real possibility and we’ll soon have confirmation if this is happening in people. In the meantime, “are you feeling lucky?” That is the question that the CDC should be asking people before they get the shot. Everyone should be warned about this before they get the shot. That will be true informed consent. Instead, people are kept in the dark. Nobody getting the shot has a clue. Is that really the way we do medicine in America to keep people in the dark like this?
I had doctors look at over 600 vaccine death reports. They found that 3 died from Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (CJD) which is extremely rate: it occurs naturally in 1 in 1 million people. Nobody can explain the .5% rate observed here. That’s 5,000 times normal. It didn’t happen by chance and the only thing these people had in common is it started right after the COVID vaccine. How can a safe vaccine cause CJD? Answer: a safe vaccine can’t. An unsafe vaccine can. No fact checker will touch that. For more, see the CJD section of “My latest survey.”
Unfortunately, the medical community is still united that censorship of articles in mainstream medical journals is OK when it conflicts with the political narrative. So it’s still fine with everyone that papers such as the Rose paper on myocarditis rates after the COVID vaccines which was withdrawn by the publisher because they didn’t like the conclusion. There is still nobody speaking out against Elsevier for unethically censoring science. Not one person from the pro-vax side thinks censoring science is wrong. It’s stunning because it is so objectively unethical. Nobody can defend this but everyone is silent.
Haiti did not vaccinate its citizens. The current vax rate is 1.4% — yet country has one of lowest COVID death rates in the world. How is that possible?
They’ve admitted that nobody will defend the policies of the CDC or FDA on camera. We put out an open call for someone to do this and go no responses. They promote the narrative only when they are assured they will not be challenged with inconvenient things such as evidence and facts.
We are seeing medical doctors like Andy Bostom writing a scathing op-ed about Brown University where he works on the cover-up of a student who died from myocarditis after forced vaccination. So doctors armed with the facts are now willing to sacrifice their careers to tell the truth.
People are starting to wake up to the poor risk benefit of the vaccines. Our latest surveys give the same estimated number of deaths from the vaccine as the VAERS data (and 10 other sources): 500,000 at this point. But the estimated number of COVID lives saved based on the clinical trial is 1 in 22,000 which means around 10,000 lives saved. So we’ve killed 500,000 people to maybe save 10,000 people. That’s dumb. Nobody will debate me on the numbers. I even offered $1M to anyone who could disprove our estimates and show us the right numbers. No takers.
Elderly care homes like Palo Alto Commons can’t hide in the shadows forever. My article recounts 6 residents getting the jab there and all 6 died within 5 weeks of the jab in their sleep, even though most all were perfectly healthy. How can 6 out of 6 die? The elderly is where the greatest benefit vs. risk is. It’s a felony to file a false VAERS report (and there is no incentive to go to jail here for the reporter) and Palo Alto Commons is saying nothing, falsely trying to hide behind HIPAA.
The numbers just aren’t working out for the promoters of the vaccine. In NSW Australia, the vaccination rate is 96.7% . That means that if the vaccines are reducing hospitalization risk by 90%, then 25% of the people in the hospital should be unvaccinated. That’s what the math says. So why are there no unvaccinated people getting sick?
I’ve written nearly 1,000 articles on issues with the vaccine on my substack. Another excellent substack of vaccine injury stories is stopmandatoryvaccination. These stories are hard to explain if the vaccines are safe and effective.
Did you know that the likelihood of being infected by someone with COVID is proportional to their viral load? Probably not because the CDC never told you that. Do you want to know why the CDC never told you that? It’s because the viral load of vaccinated people is the same as unvaccinated people. Check out this paper, Isolation of 4000 SARS-CoV-2 shows that contagiousness is associated with viral load, not vaccine or symptomatic status. You vaccine status has nothing to do with your contagiousness. So vaccinating yourself to protect others is silly. Which means vaccine mandates are silly. But when has science ever had anything to do with public health policy? People are told to just shut up and do as they are told. And most people buy it.
Have you ever wondered why, with evidence like this, nobody in the medical community is saying anything? It’s because the whole thing is controlled by the government and if you piss off the government, you’re out of business, that’s why. I received this note from the CEO of a big hospital basically saying that the hospitals are just pawns and can’t speak out or risk retaliation from the government and I have to convince the FDA that they are wrong. In short, he’s saying we cannot win because the FDA has accountability to no one. Here’s what he wrote after I asked him if he and his hospital would speak the truth about what is happening inside the hospitals with all the vaccine injuries and deaths: “With regards to my involvement, I must respectfully decline. Hospitals are largely governed by the local county health departments and regulations from the federal government, thus I’m sure you can understand that I cannot be of any use to you in advancing your position. I’m happy to listen, but I cannot take a position on this topic.” This is why some people have suggested that we use retired doctors and nurses (who cannot be retaliated against) to convince the public (since the public trusts doctors and nurses), especially if those doctors and nurses retired because of what they were seeing. But we can also use docs in current practice by obscuring their face/voice on camera.
There don’t appear to be any scientists who work in vaccine safety at the CDC anymore. I emailed hundreds of internal CDC emails (all people working on the COVID vaccines) asking if anyone would consider evidence that goes against the narrative. No replies. A true scientist is always open to new data and to finding the truth. So the CDC “scientists” aren’t scientists; they are “propagandists.” If you find someone who works at the CDC who is willing to consider evidence that runs contrary to the narrative, let me know. But they will likely be instantly fired if they consider that the CDC could be wrong.
There are simply too many Black Swans anecdotes to ignore. For example, this Black Swan shouldn’t exist with only a population of a billion people (if you believe the narrative), but these stories are all too common. I’ve heard stories of multiple deaths within a family after the vaccine. They are so common I don’t keep track of them anymore. For example, this is one I just received yesterday from an ICU nurse who lost her fiancé to the vax and whose brother almost died from the vax but was lucky and now has an ICD implanted likely for the rest of his life:
I have a list of 1,000 people who are vaccine injured (that’s the public view with the contact info redacted so you can read the horror stories). But vaccine injury is said by the CDC to rare. But how can these people have over 80 symptoms that are common to the vaccinated and only develop those symptoms after the vaccine and not before the vaccine? So how can there be Facebook groups of 250,000 people injured from the COVID vaccine? These groups get deleted by Facebook when they grow to any size so people will never realize how big the problem is. These groups have to talk in “code” to avoid being detected and deleted by Facebook.
Did you know that public health officials are there to protect the drug companies and not the public? Check out these emails from one of the top public health officials in Canada (Bonnie Henry). And note the techniques that all good public health officials use in order to obscure the truth from the public (see 3:00 into the video). There are lots of other issues pointed out in the video and then she starts showing the actual emails at around 10:00 into the video. You’ll see that the priority is on public messaging so as to not implicate the vaccine in the death and there is no interest in assessing causality.
The Brighton Collaboration is used for adverse event definitions, but this is now controlled by CEPI which is controlled by the pharmaceutical companies. So the pharma companies get to redefine the adverse event definitions. And they do. How convenient. And you thought all of this was objective, on the level? No way. See this video at 17:00 for an explanation of the conflicts of interest. One physician in Canada wrote me after learning this, “Yes, the video was very interesting. Particularly their use of the Brighton criteria that explains why we aren’t picking up a safety signal here in Canada. I think this is worth developing further.”
Infant deaths are being reported in the press in Israel, but being suppressed here. It’s only a matter of time before this spreads to Europe and will eventually be impossible to ignore in the US. That same article talks about drug companies having “hit lists” of doctors that they seek to silence because they criticized the drug. This is from court testimony. It also talks about Pfizer’s cattle vaccine (PregSure BVD) which killed 15% of the cows. It took 4 years before it was pulled from the market in 2010. It’s happening again, this time in people (though with a kill rate of only 0.2% for people.
I have all the death records in New Mexico for 2020. Guess what? When you look at the ICD-10 codes of the death records, you will find that there were only around 330 true COVID deaths, not 2,000. So 5 out of 6 COVID deaths were simply “with COVID” and not “from COVID.” New Mexico has 2M population and 2M die a year so we are looking at a total 1.5% ACM increase from COVID in 2020 and that was ruled to be an emergency and a pandemic?! That’s ridiculous. So the point is that they hyped up the perception by publicizing any COVID death, and then they backed it up with inflated numbers to create the perception of an emergency. NOBODY will go on camera with me to dispute this.
The denial of adverse is events is stunning. There were Facebook groups with over 250,000 vaccine injured people that were deleted. I personally have a list of 1,000 vaccine injured. So when I asked a panel of scientists at MIT whether they believed the CDC who says that they haven’t found any link between the COVID vaccines and the vaccine injured, 100% of the panelists said “yes, they believe the CDC is telling the truth.” They even personally attacked me for asking the question!! It’s all on video. You can watch it at 4:56:00. It is jaw dropping that there is such brainwashing.
I offered to personally pay the medical costs for any US airline willing to screen all their pilots for heart issues. No takers. What does that tell you? In fact, if you read the article, it points out that if the vaccines were actually safe, Moderna and Pfizer would be offering gobs of money to the airlines to screen all their pilots which if they are telling the truth would PROVE that their vaccines don’t cause heart issues. But they aren’t doing that. Why not?
We’ve never had a vaccine where the data shows that the benefits outweigh the risk. If there was such a vaccine, the COVID vaccines would be in dead last place for contention since the adverse events from the COVID vaccine are more than all other vaccines in the 30 year history of VAERS combined. It would be hard for someone to argue this is the first safe vaccine.
It’s becoming more well know, thanks to RFK’s book, that the CDC deliberately cancelled the ESP:VAERS project which would have vastly increased the sensitivity of the VAERS system to adverse events. The project was cancelled because it showed that all the vaccines were unsafe. That was politically a non-starter, so they had to kill the project. That is why we have such a lame adverse event reporting system in the US today.
Fraud by journals is being exposed. For example, this fraudulent study published in Frontiers in Medicine exaggerated pediatric deaths. Fenton used well established CFR and IFR rates to make his point (for those under 20, the IFR should be less than 1 in 37,000). The journal refused to comment on Fenton’s analysis.
Professor Norman Fenton has exposed that the UK government data on vaccine safety and efficacy is fraudulent. That table lays bare just how corrupt the UK Government has been in manipulating the data. Every single claim the government has made on vaccine efficacy and safety is now proven to be bogus. Nobody wants to talk about it. Censorship is the technique they use to counter this since they don’t have data.
People are waking up and noticing that Australian newborns are not having immune responses against common viruses like influenza. This is happening now, which is after most mothers have been vaccinated for COVID. It clearly wasn’t caused by COVID because we are just seeing this now. It may take a while for people to figure out this is from the “safe and effective” vaccines. Again, nobody will debate this on camera to me. This along with the 400% rise in child casket demand should cause everything thinking person to hit the pause button.
Not a single person supporting the false narrative has agreed with UCSF Professor Vinay Prasad’s request for an open discussion. The moment this changes, it will be a huge crack in the dam. But for now, they’ve been 100% circle the wagons and nobody breaks ranks. Prasad’s op-ed was entitled “Scientists who express different views on Covid-19 should be heard, not demonized.” It appeared more than two years ago, and to date, there has not been a single open discussion.
Official Canadian government statistics show vaccines can increase the risk of death from COVID by 50%; vaccinated but unboosted people were about 50 percent more likely to be hospitalized or die of Covid than unvaccinated people. That’s really stunning because not only are the vaccines helping you die from COVID, but the vaccines are killing massive numbers of people who don’t have COVID and were perfectly healthy. The data from Manitoba appear to mark the first time that any government agency has actually found a higher risk of death from COVID in vaccinated people.
Robert Malone doesn’t pull any punches when he describes the causes of the pandemic. Basically, our government trusted the wrong people and organizations. Simple as that. It may take years before they figure it out but at least it’s all laid out on the table.
This article shows the vaccines have a severe impact on reproductive health, Paxlovid trial stopped for lack of efficacy in standard risk patients, there were no clear differences between the use of medical/surgical masks compared with N95/P2 respirators in healthcare workers when used in routine care to reduce respiratory viral infection.The CDC lied to us about all of this.
People are starting to realize that our medical ethics were low before. Now they are even lower.
I’ll update this list over time, but that’s the list off the top of my head on what is going on. The momentum is all moving in our direction from what I can see.
As always, check out the comments below for additional insights from my readers. I’m only telling part of the story. There are over 1,000 comments you should read in addition to my article.
In a country where the people who make law are supposed to be elected or else if an agency, to follow the APA and accept public comment before rulemaking, we have the board of the CDC able to release “guidelines” which all states and most private companies take as law and implement.
CDC is aware of this – having just seen how their 2016 guidance on opioids led to strict implementation of restrictions of doses over – 90 mmes —morphine milligram equivalents. That was even though the CDC guidelines said to look carefully at prescriptions for more than that – not that it should be forbidden. The guidelines formed the basis of state laws or enforcement actions against doctors prescribing that much, insurance companies refusing to cover amounts more than that, and people who were on higher amounts than that being tapered down even though their doctors believed the amount was appropriate before the guidance came out.
So they know the kind of power they hold, and had semi tried to correct the opioid mme statement by putting out a new one four years later clarifying. Nonetheless, they also in the time since 2016 have abused their power by leading the charge on the whole covid19 trickery.
This is an issue the only way out I can see is a court action. otherwise, it is a dictatorship in which 25 people who could be/seem to be bought out by the pharmaceutical companies or new world order vote unanimously to add what is not a vaccine antigen based but rather a mrna gene therapy product without years of testing could be named a vaccine and put on the list of vaccines parents must give their children in order to attend school or sports.
When kids have a chance of 99.998 of surviving any covid infection- and coronaviruses are always going to be around because they infect animals too so it can never be eradicated like polio and they are always going to be mutating which in fact makes it extra wrong to give kids the old outdated covid19 thing to have their first strongest immune reaction to rather than the coronavirus that is strongest when they are 6 months old.
It is treachery and depravity of the highest order and these evil people received tens of thousands of comments asking them not to add it to the vaccine schedule and they did anyway and said they had data showing it was more safe than not but will not share the data. Then they comfort themselves by saying it is not the law, it is just a guideline, but watch every state will implement it to the tee the way in the guidelines. what is the point of taking comments if they vote unanimously the new world order way anyway?
The court must stop this or else they are saying the government through an unelected agency advisory board can make even young children put genetically modifying material in their body and that’s that. even though the disease they would catch without the “vaccine” would not kill them and even though young people had high rates of myocarditis after the vaccine. I hope I can find what law firm is doing this and go work for them
Oh, and Justin Trudeau banned handguns in Canada today so even more evil.
It’s an 8 hour meeting, which youtube luckily transcribes, so I could read through it. I got to the youtube of the meeting from this article here which I remembered, and which, amazingly enough, came up as the first search result on GOOGLE, if you can believe it. I pasted it in sheets and read it.
Some highlights.
A. Dr. Marion Gerber of the Office of Research and Review: @33:28 Section 361 of the Public Health Service Act states, a biologic application shall be approved based on a demonstration biological product is safe and pure and potent and the facility in which the biologic product is made meets standard designed to assure the biological product continues to be safe and pure and potent. What that means is that only those vaccines that have demonstrated to be safe and effective and can be manufactured in a consistent manner would be licensed by the FDA.
I note that they permitted the vaccines to continue to be used even after data showed that the adverse events were distributed unevenly throughout the batches. The vast majority of batches had 0-1 events, and about 20 batches had hundreds. This shows that the vaccine was not manufactured consistently – since the adverse events from certain batches is from either contaminated or stronger than normal batches, i.e. not consistent.
known potential benefit of the investigational product Indiscernible] use of investigation of COVID19 vaccine
44:37:00
under EUA is not subject to informed consent requirement however vaccine needs to be provided a fact sheet and
44:46:00
describes investigational nature of the product the known and
44:52:00
potential benefit and risk of the product, available alternatives, and the option to review reviews
45:00:00
they say luckily it is not subject to informed consent
draft list of potential covid19 vaccines adverse outcomes known to fda oct 2020 before approval
Found 137,251 cases where Vaccine targets COVID-19 (COVID19 or COVID19-2) and Symptom is Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis or Acute myocardial infarction or Anaphylactic reaction or Anaphylactic shock or Arthralgia or Arthritis or Autoimmune disorder or Cataplexy or Convulsion or Death or Disseminated intravascular coagulation or Disseminated intravascular coagulation in newborn or Encephalitis or Encephalomyelitis or Encephalopathy or Guillain-Barre syndrome or Kawasaki’s disease or Meningitis or Meningoencephalitis bacterial or Meningoencephalitis herpetic or Meningoencephalitis viral or Multisystem inflammatory syndrome or Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in adults or Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children or Myelitis or Myocarditis or Narcolepsy or Pericarditis
January 2020 and researchers shared the genetic sequences of the new virus international databases on January
1:08:23
reported a day later we had researchers who were jump into vaccine development and they had a specific approach
1:08:32
they wanted to take to vaccine development. The reason why they were so prime to do this work is because the NIH had made a
1:08:40
long-term investment in pandemic preparedness response research and preparedness research basic and
1:08:49
specifically, these researchers had worked on this family of data
1:08:56
coronaviruses we knew from both SARS and MERS that the family had the potential to cause epidemic and we knew they could
1:09:06
in some cases be spread by respiratory route which is obviously one of the key features of pathogen
Charles c.w. Cooke has held a special place in my heart, and in the lore of our household, due to his amazing performance on the Bill Maher show in 2012. In a segment in which Charles, Joy Reid, and Glenn Greenwald were discussing Benghazi, Charles contrasted the American revolution with other modern revolutions.
He explained, “so i think Americans have a problem thinking about this sometimes because –and i include myself and British people –because the revolution that happened here was great, um and very rarely is that the case in the world . you know you have this revolution in America in which um the British fight the British and then they codify classical liberal values into a Constitution and it’s great but that’s not how it goes down normally normally there’s bloodshed and it’s horrible and especially in the middle east what they want to replace their dictatorships with if you look at the the polling is sharia law.”
His point could have led to some very interesting side paths, but instead, Joy Reid burst forth with the dutifully produced race based “slavery is bad” line, the only line the left seems to have about anything before 1965. (slavery/segregation interchangeable)
Charles waited until she was done, and even though she was trying to throw it to him, stuck to his point, and said “that the slavery point, i think , is cheap, if I’m honest “
“the point is is that if you’re looking for perfection in the 18th century, you’re not going to find it what the Americans did was a massive step forward it wasn’t perfect it was resolved in a civil war that was bloody and awful but if we’re going to write off the greatest revolution and the greatest Constitution in world history because it was imperfect and it was flawed then we might as well all go home”
Now, you can see that shows a boldness and insight not seen in many Americans, and with the most beautiful not plummy don’t know where it’s from accent from UK, said by a man who did his degree at Oxford? in the UK? on the American bill of rights and .
Which is why it was extremely frustrating to hear him on the now discontinued mad dogs and Englishman podcast the other day, stating that because Trump had said that he “should be reinstated” (as President partway through Biden’s term) (presumably after the midterm) because the election was a fraud and Joe Biden didn’t honestly win and there was actual concrete evidence abounding.
Of course, since the Democrats “won” the house and had the tie-breaking vice president in the senate and the Biden interlocutory resident, the only investigations involving the 2020 election have been these horrific ones where they have been going after people who were there in DC on Jan 6 to show their support for Trump, but who were arrested and held often in solitary for up to a year, on the basis of unlawful entry into a government building. I’ve gone over that before, how it is likely a left scheme to smear and come up with a reason to malign Trump and the Republicans and anyone who questions the election of 2020. Simply paint it as an insurrection, leave out that there were FBI and other instigators involved which are not being revealed, and you see it was just taking advantage of the Trump supporters presence in DC to imply that there was unlawful intent to block or overturn the perfectly proper election results.
As I have said, if the Trump voters had wanted to do something unlawful, why do it on Jan 6, the last day to legally bring evidence before Congress before they accept the results? Insurrections and coups don’t abide by deadlines for lawful procedures. But over and over again leading up to Jan 6, Trump’s supporters had communicated and shown that they intended to work within the law . That was the reason for all the lawsuits they filed – using the legal process to bring their evidence before the courts up to and including mandamus petitions at all levels. While the Democrats with their fraudulently obtained numbers simply took a knee and let time run out. So EVERYTHING was riding on January 6 being the day that the evidence could be brought in front of Congress before they certified the electors votes. That was the plan, was my understanding, there was a chance to bring the evidence before Congress and the people that day, and there were presentations planned by lawyers on the Trump side. Because the courts had thrown out all the cases, even though that is the incorrect standard to hear a case, you don’t have to have all the evidence in line before you get a hearing. And they had affidavits and mathematical examinations and proofs of anomalies up the ass, but the captured or blackmailed courts just froze.
Secondarily, we must remember that many also went because they realized that if the electors votes were certified, it was also a last chance to join with other Trump supporters to revel in the happiness and freedom we had felt under President Trump, and a chance to show him, en masse, our deep appreciation for his tireless devotion to America and Americans. The first president who had done what he said he would,fighting the deep state every step of the way, making America great again. Trump had asked them to come to DC to so that the great millions assembled would show the Congress that the people disputed the election results and wanted Congress to see how many actual Trump supporters they were. As Trump said, s, that way, after Congress had seen the evidence that the election was massively fraudulent, and was asked to vote against certifying such ill gotten supposed vote numbers,they could look out and d see the millions gathered there in a proper peaceful assembly for redress of grievances and feel emboldened to stop the steal..
Arg. So Charles says that because it’s preposterous and there is no evidence that the election was stolen or fraudulent (que?) that for Trump to say that he “should be reinstated” though Biden was already sworn in is a statement of intent to overthrow or use some unlawful process to be reinstalled. (even if based on fraudulent results that can now be proven fraudulent through the packets data Mike Lindell has and through the 2000 mules phone trace data in the movie about the operatives dropping off hundreds of ballots across state lines after stopping by Democratic agencies to get paid to do so.)
Real proof/.
Which isn’t to say I agree that Biden should be overthrown and Trump installed, come on Charles, you know the Republicans – or at least Trump and his MAGA nation – believe in the proper law and process being followed. That is not necessarily what Trump means by the phrase either. Saying “I should be reinstalled as the rightful president” doesn’t mean he was suggesting it be done unlawfully.
Yes, reinstalling is unprecedented, I get that, so that would be a problem unless we could find a law that covered that. Why is it unprecedented, because presidents who get 10 million more votes in their reelection ALWAYS win their reelection, and the only other time one did not was yet another election wherein fraud was suspected, I think the Nixon versus Kennedy one if I’m not mistaken.
Anyway, so then Charles took it a step further, because with just the Trump was wrong to say that part, all he would be suggesting is don’t let Trump convince you to unlawfully overthrow the sitting President. But Charles kicked it up a notch from that innocuous level, in a way scarily like how the media and left do with things. Make a huge intertwined narrative out of a thing that gets the left exactly what they want. So to show you, imagine, how would this statement differ if Pelosi said it? not at all, and that’s why it’s scary that Charles said it.
He said “And in the midterm, any Republican who said they support Trump without specifically disavowing that Trump should be reinstalled (because that would violate the law) no Republican should vote for that Republican candidate in that case, because they are advocating violating the law. “
And when the interviewer said well, what if they just said he should be reinstalled without specifying how or stating they would do it unlawfully? Doesn’t matter. And what if the candidate simply said they think Trump should win in 2024? And Charles said “Well, then you’d have to consider more and where they come in on other things”
So his solution is that it would be better for America if Republicans voted for commie leftie dems rather than anyone who didn’t disavow Trump’s rather vague, “I should be reinstalled”.
I think “I should be reinstalled” is a great way for Trump to “the election was fake” and “Joe Biden didn’t actually win and we all know it” without saying those phrases which will now get you banned as part of the Jan 6 insurrection for questioning the election results.
Charles Cooke, for once, was wrong. Amazing. It has taken ten years, but here it is. He was wrong. He didn’t consider it from different angles and he let himself get blinded by one side of it. Not only that, unlike his usual measured commentary, in this he actually magnified the error by suggesting that6 people base their Congressional voting on this one phrase of Trump’s. So I hope you see this and think some more, Charles Cooke, because you usually are right on the money and I count on your insight because of it.
Hathaway and McKinley (1940) MMPI contained Psychopathic Deviate Scale. This was constructed by writing a number of questions, giving them to criterion groups of those manifesting psychopathic behavior and ‘‘normals’’, and selecting for the scale the questions best differentiating the two groups. The criterion group manifesting psychopathic behavior consisted of 17–24 year olds with ‘‘long histories of delinquent type behaviors such as stealing, lying, alcohol abuse, promiscuity, forgery and truancy’’ (Archer, 1997, p. 20). The common feature of this group has been described as their failure to ‘‘learn those anticipatory anxieties which operate to deter most people from committing anti-social behavior’’ (Marks, Seeman, & Haller, 1974, p. 25). The manual describes those scoring high on the scale as follows: irresponsible, antisocial, aggressive, having recurrent marital and work problems, and underachieving (Hathaway & McKinley, 1989). A number of subsequent studies have shown that the Psychopathic Deviate scale differentiates delinquents and criminals from nondelinquents and non-criminals (e.g. Elion & Megargee, 1975).
Richard Lynn’s “race differences in psychopathic personality”
In summary, Lynn suggests that the missing data required to explain the remaining mystery of “the Bell Curve”, under which even where normed for iq, whites and blacks still showed disparities in a number of factors. Lynn posits that the races differ in their amounts of psychopathic personality traits, which he defines using the dsm-iv statistical manual definition. He notes that the term has been redefined as anti-social personality disorder by the apa in this edition, but notes that some still use psychopathic and they can be considered interchangeable and both correct. Then Lynn proceeds to examine large scale studies from a variety of western countries (thousands of subjects in each study) and plots their results in tables by race for the various psychopathic personality categories. The fit is very good, and this suggests that indeed race differences in these psychopathic traits explain it.
The psychopathic traits rank inversely between the races compared to iq. The order is simply reversed. Thus, where asians have the highest iq, they have the lowest levels of psychopathic personallity traits – about 1/3 to 2/3 the level of whites on all measures. Next highest is white iq, and the next lowest level of ppt is white. Next lowest in iq is hispanics, who are higher than whites in ppt, in most measures coming in at something like 140% of white values in various measures. Then come blacks, the second highest or highest of ppt (swtichging back and forth with native americans for various measures). The magnitude of difference between whites and blacks is described as “a half a standard deviation higher than whites” which in numerical terms is something between 2.5 to 10 times the level of whites in various measures. The differences between hispanic and blacks is less, because hispanics are higher than whites.
The native americans come in highest on many of the measures – not working, beating women and children, and flauting the law, but the blacks are close. Nonetheless, when the distribution of the traits as found by testing with MMPI and other measures gives a clear hierarchy of psychopathic personality traits in the races. This finding also then fits with the racial situation in the criminal justice system in all the white countries – inclduing ones who just recently began forcing diversity and replacement through immigration like in Germany, France, etc. which is namely – most of the crime in your country will be done by blacks and also, native americans if you have them, or hajis is you have them, or hispanic. The less white you are the more crime. Because the less white you are, the more ppt.
Under the rule of law, which white countries were good at living under until the chosens wormed their way to invasion and then usurpation, people behaving with the traits shown in the ppt would be moved out of main society and into the penal system, and as their level of depravity rose to the level of murder and violence, the white western culture in fact responded with capitol punishment seeking to permanently remove such deviancy from the gene pool.
whites are not just “between”
He then explores if the theory works with existing models of the evolution of racial differences – the explanation given for why whites and northern asians are more cooperati ve and smarter and show these same traits no matter the country they move to. Lynn emphasizes over and over again that asians are the lowest in ppt, the blacks/nas are the highest, the mexicans in the middle and the whites betwqeen.
+This is somewhat aggravating, for the same reason it was infuriating when Rushton (jenson?) did it – whites come somewhere in the middle is hardly a fair description of a race who are close to the highest iq and close to the lowest ppt. A proportional understanding of the magnitudes of differences between the races is as important as the hierarchical ranking. If one student gets an A and one gets an F, one gets a D and one gets a B, is it fair to say that the student who gets a B is “somewhere in the middle” of the A student and the F one? It also does not correctly identify that the D student is just a bit better than the F, but still not succeeding, and even though they are two above the F, they are also 2 below the B AND THE B IS ONLY ONE BELOW THE A, THE CLOSEST IN RANKING OF ANY TWO RACEbetwqeens are A, whites are B, hispanics are D and blacks are F. This actually is a great example because these are much like the actual grades these races receive. For the measure of ppt, the letter grades must be awarded to the least ppt, again, so asians are A, whites B, hispanics D and blacks F.
The letter example I hope drives home why for whites who are the B student all the time, just a bit behind the Asian A student, it is offensive to be called somewhere in the middle of hispanics and asians, and even worse, somehwere in the middle of asians and blacks!. Rushton/Jenson should in fact make an erratum for the paper that states over and over again, asians are highest, blacks lowest, whites somewhere in between. There is one sstandard deviation between black and white iq. The median iq for whites is 100, for american blacks, 85 is the median. 15 iq points is a standard deviation. Asians have a median iq of 107/108. That is half the difference. (Note also that if asian is divided into north asian and south asian, the north is higher than that, but if you split white into north white and south white – the north whites are higher than 100 – that number is brought down somewhat by the southern euro whites like portugal spain and greece and italy, whose iqs bring the median down to 100 when all whites are lumped together. If all asians are lumped together including south asians like laos, indonesia, etc, the median comes down becdause just like the south whites the south asians have lower iqs. By the way, the differences are like 4-5 iq points between the north ones and southg ones – not a big difference, about the gender differendce in iq, (men are five iq points higher). However, if comparing northern asian only north asian iq to all whites lumped intogethger iq it makes whites look farther away from asians than we are. 8 iq points makes it half the difference between whites and asians as between blacks and whites 8 versus 15 rather than the true number, which is about 5 from asians and then 15 down to blacks.
Traits and races left out of the MMPI construction
in further exploration of psychopathic traits by race, I propose a scale which captures the racial psychopathologies left out of the MMPI likely due to the lack of a criterion group including races less likely to be among those with “long histories of delinquent type behaviors such as stealing, lying, alcohol abuse, promiscuity, forgery and truancy” (Archer, 1997, p. 20) These include the chosens and Asians. These two races are at the center (or behind the curtain) in many of the most horrific atrocities of the last 200 years such as Mao’s massacres and the Bolsheviks in Russia. The sheer numbers killed (in the millions) and the depravity of the regimes demonstrate atrocity level psychopathy which exceeds by orders of magnitude, the moral lack demonstrated by the traits selected in the MMPI construction. If one considers the cheka and the gulags and the ongoing terror and crushing of the human spirit demonstrated by such a regime, the mmpi psychopathic traits look merely irritating.
To demonstrate the dangerousness of these non mmpi psychopathies, this new scale, which I propose calling the atrocity scale, would rate the racial deviancy level by consideringwhen a certain race was the ruling class, the number and nature of civilian dead, by the level of depravity and horror of civilian punishments and civilian deaths, and including some cumulative measurement of dread, terror and sheer human suffering of civilians under various rulers while alive.
There certainly ought to be a way of measuring the psychopathology of those who may be punctual, pay on time, not speak out of turn, stay married, yet who, upon assuming or obtaining power, becomes “the boot stepping on a human face forever” of Orwell’s 1984
Ability to torture and kill “without a shred of human remorse”
[on the October Revolution] You must understand. The leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. The October Revolution was not what you call in America the “Russian Revolution.” It was an invasion and conquest over the Russian people. More of my countrymen suffered horrific crimes at their bloodstained hands than any people or nation ever suffered in the entirety of human history. It cannot be understated. Bolshevism was the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant of this reality is proof that the global media itself is in the hands of the perpetrators.
Since presumably the opposite of deviancy is pro personal intellectual and spiritual freedom, that is what we see the whites do and did.
Whiites with power
A desire to enoble mankind. Pathological altruism. Although tragically this has nearly ended our race’s existence and certainly will if not reversed, the western, Christian values based on the worth of the individual – led our white western societies out of barbarism and up to self-rule under consent of the governed, the US Constitution and Bill of Rights.
What is forgotten when berating whites of today for slavery 300 years ago is that it leaves out that the entire world had slavery while america did, and in many places still does. It was England and america that led the charge to eradicate slavery and it was missionary whites from various colonial nations who set it as their goal to bring Christianity and education, sanitation, the end of infanticide, child rape, cannibalism to all the races. In this trait, sharing with all, the whites stand alone, and it is for this that their demise would be a tragedy to all. . The state of most of the non Christian world in 1870 is astounding. How far we’ve come.
But this great work done by the whites, in many cases without any financial benefit and often at their own cost, millions of white missionaries took to the villages to bring the people into modernity and health and knowledge – requiring the villages be free of these shocking violent savageries such as eating babies, laughing at hurt dogs and hurting them for sport, or cooking them while they were alive (done in China to this day)
What is done with power? (chosens and asians)
The scale must also measure not only a race’s propensity to pool resources to gain control of various aspects of society, but the desired goals shown through actions taken once control is achieved. Versus asian (chinese communist) and chosen (google and facebook are chosen owned) focussed on censorship and depersonning of the internet; the first medium where all could have had a voice and the truth could have been found.
Thus these measures appear to coalesce around actions having mass impacts, as logically, for example the mmpi deviants only could impact those in their direct community and their physical presence. Two parts of the scale : the trait times the number of people impacted must be considered.
Willingness to organize in secret, conspire, and destroy systems
The willingness to use an international network of like minded conspirators, international control of money and complete control over information shows a deviancy orders of magnitude above the mmpi deviance because the actions taken impact orders of magnitude greater numbers of people negatively.
Engaging in deceit subterfusion and subversion
information as in America’s media and now social media and internet and then use such control to “manipulate an entire species” in the words of google indicate and control over others through usury and central banking as in the setting up of the federal reserve which used Western Europeans moral sense against their own western European races, which used the individual rights based individual freedoms and free markets, representative government and even western government tax code’s support of non profits to imbed a foreign element loyal to foreign goals at the least, and possibly adhering to goal for the ultimate destruction and usurpation by global elite totalitarianism.
in the open to strangers western under rule of law scale should also measure the ability to subvert well intentioned systems of government, and laws pertaining to nonprofits foundation a and even science in a twisted way to achieve the exact opposite of what they were intended for.
Rules don’t apply to them
Also measure how they get away with it and are untouchable
“without a shred of human remorse”
While all we hear about now is how the Chinese exclusion act and black slavery and Indians on reservations and interning the Japanese was the worst thing ever deserving of so much punishment its only fair that all white countries become non white so as to be inclusive of every race that already has their own monorace counties and continents, what level of psychopathy is represented by the chosen’s ruination of our nations by trickery and deceit and more than that what of the absolute debased level of ppt shown by the Bolsheviks and the Chinese who assisted them in such tortured as surgically sewing peoples genitals together?much less psychopathic than whites? No.
Yet the chosens and asians Were perpetrators or participants in atrocities which whites had stopped doing by the 1200s. Medieval torture methods such as cutting body parts off people who were alive, done in Nanking by the Japanese in 1940s.
Whites and Asians – the high iq ones that moved north – but different due to individualist versus group/conformity societies.
He then explores if the theory works with existing models of the evolution of racial differences – the explanation given for why whites and northern asians are more cooperati ve and smarter and show these same traits no matter the country they move to. Lynn discusses how the whites and asians came to live in the north with traits which made them less psychopathic. He pointed out the need to provision women and children, the need to cooperatively hunat, the need to plan ahead such as agriculture and storing for the winter, as well as getting along with others to do sos
There is truth to that, but the explanation blurs the line between the two very different cultures which developed as a results of, or with traits that were selected for on the move north. Because Lynn refers to these various traits such as provisioning and cooperating as if held by the two races equally, this leaves the impression that the nearly their societies had much in common. An erroneous view could thus be formed that since whites and asians have the same traits they developed by going north that vis a vis whites, asians – or as Lynn puts it “especially north Asians” would have selected for these traits, their races success could then be mistakenly seen as they are simply the highest level on a continuum of certain traits which whites also value but don’t do as well. I agree with some chagrin, that asians are better at 1. staying married, 2. keeping financial commitments 3. following law and pro social rules 4. starting and running small businesses even without speaking much English 5.increasing their wealth and power and 6. having a stable society and making their race the most plentiful. Ok. And if we talk meritocracy in America now, like for admissions, if I am pro meritocracy I have to face that asians will get most of the spots.
However, I believe there are aspects of the success of the asians that are similar to those assessed as group evolutionary strategies for jews by Kevin MacDonald. He notes the impermeable multi-generational in-group versus the west, which was unique in having a couple and their children as the building block – with permeable, recurring interactions wherein a person could abandon the group in following his or her own decisions. europeans were The only race that had romantic love with the nuclear family as the building block. Universal individualism, and the resulting openness to free markets, self rule, and to letting others into the group which is connected but not by blood.
Whites:individualism plus high iq means when in power, whites share and try to prevent accumulation of power in a small group (but very vulnerable to asian and chosen deceit etc)
But when considering group evolutionary strategy, Kevin MacDonald points out that north euro culture alone has the concept of romantic love, a pair bond between a man and a woman who freely choose one another. The basic unit of society is the nuclear family. The choosing of leaders is done by the group selecting who they believe in, who can lose that leadership role if people lose faith he leaves out two key points about the north asian and the north white society that warrant deep attention. Conformity versus individuality, and hierarchy as earned and kept or solidly in place forever. Also, inventions, as in Charles Murray human accomplishment. Lack of exploring the world by other cultures.
And what about the Chinese prostitutes in san fran who were let to die when they got to old, and were slaves stuck alone in a room while they were alive. What about murdering female infants (if not mistaken, this preceded the 1 child rule and happened throughout history because daughters are a burden) what about current chinese use of associations and secret societies and de3ceit to get their way into western politicians’ favor. F
The only thing we have been hearing about on absolutely every station is Ukraine, Ukraine, Ukraine.
because we know it’s a manipulation, we’ve been ignoring it.
But that’s partly because in 2014 LaRouche pointed out the color revolution going on there run by Victoria Nuland and Joe Biden. Thenb, the very last good vice television show was when they went into donestk and donbass and filmed them and the people they filmed said you’ll film it here, but when you go back , they won’t show it. Because lots of media went there but did not actually show it, since it did not fit the narrative.
Yes, so the coup was successful and they got the cia’s wanted people in, and then those people proceeded to bomb and shell etc. those two regions of east ukraine that vice covered (before they got immediately bought out by bill maher and others because hye went outside the narrative) m so much so that they declared themselves republics have been fighting to stay alive ever since. because the installed government used military against civilians.
Putin knew even at the time who was behind the coup, he said on tv that he could tell you the names and the dates of everything leading up to the coup. Now he is also aware of what is going on, and that is that they want to basing rights in ukraine because then they are only 20 minute missile strike from moscow, plus nato who hasn’t been doing anything for 30 years will feel like they are doing something useful. what, like picking a fight with the only other white country not already decimated by immigration and low birthrates? Or just a nuclear one?
So they are up to their retarded propaganda and it is so gay that i’m not going to look at the news about ukraine for another month after I finish writing this.. Because yesterday, russia “bombed a maternity hospital” according to the western press. Where have we heard that sort of thing before? oh, babies being thrown out of incubators – in the lead up to another bad idea war.
And then today, there was a “russian terror group” attack on a theatre full of people in ukraine. Hmmmmm….
If you believe that, I’ve got a bridge in London/Brooklyn to sell you.
Here;sd a feed from a Brit who went to see what was really going on…
Site Title 
